A machine learning model for screening of body fluid cytology smears
Sanyal, P.; Rana, V.; Paul, S.; Kulhari, K.
Show abstract
IntroductionBody fluid cytology is one of the commonest investigations performed in indoor patients, both for diagnosis of suspected carcinoma as well as staging of known carcinoma. Carcinoma is diagnosed in body fluids by the pathologist through microscopic examination and searching for malignant epithelial cell clusters. The process of screening body fluid smears is a time consuming and error prone process. AimWe have attempted to construct a machine learning model which can screen body fluid cytology smears for malignant cells. Materials and methodsMGG stained Ascitic / pleural fluid cytology smears were included from 21 cases (14 malignant, 07 benign) in this study. A total of 693 microphotographs were taken at 40x magnification at the same illumination and after correction of white balance. A Magnus Microphotography system was used for photography. The images were split into the training set (195 images), test set (120 images) and validation set (378 images). A machine learning model, a convolutional neural network, was developed in the Python programming language using the Keras deep learning library. The model was trained with the images of the training set. After completion of training, the model was evaluated on the test set of images. ResultsEvaluation of the model on the test set produced a sensitivity of 97.87%, specificity 85.26%, PPV 95.18%, NPV 93.10% In 06 images, the model has failed to detect singly scattered malignant cells/ clusters. 14 (3.7%) false positives was reported by the model. The machine learning model shows potential utility as a screening tool. However, it needs improvement in detecting singly scattered malignant cells and filtering inflammatory infiltrate.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 94%
- Artificial intelligence tool for the study of COVID-19 microdroplet spread across the human diameter and airborne space 94%
- Evaluating diagnostic accuracies of Panbio ™ COVID-19 rapid antigen test and RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia using Bayesian Latent-Class Models (BLCM) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 92%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 92%
- Cervical Cancer Screening in South Florida Veteran Population 2014-2020: Cytology and High-Risk HPV Correlation and HPV Epidemiology 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 95%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 93%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical and laboratory characteristics in outpatient diagnosis of COVID-19 in healthcare professionals in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 92%
- Macrophage polarization in cesarean scar diverticulum 91%
- Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1 (LEF1) immunostaining as a surrogate of β-catenin ( CTNNB1) mutations 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.