Back

From the Modern Synthesis to the Molecular Synthesis: updating how we teach and assess evolution by natural selection

Sievers, M.; Reemts, C.; Dickinson, K.; Mukerji, J.; Beltran, I. B.; Theobald, E. J.; Velasco, V.; Freeman, S.

2021-07-21 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2021.07.19.452979 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Evolution by natural selection is recognized as both the most important concept in undergraduate biology and the most difficult to teach. Unfortunately, teaching and assessment of evolution have been impaired by legacy approaches that focus on Darwins original insights and the Modern Synthesis integration of Mendelian genetics, but ignore or downplay advances from what we term the Molecular Synthesis. To create better alignment between instructional approaches and contemporary research in the biosciences, we propose that the primary learning goal in teaching evolution should be for students to connect genotypes, phenotypes, and fitness. To support this approach, we developed and tested assessment questions and scoring rubrics called the Extended Assessing Conceptual Reasoning of Natural Selection (E-ACORNS) instrument. Initial E-ACORNS data suggest that after traditional instruction, few students recognize the molecular synthesis--prompting us to propose that introductory course sequences be re-organized with the molecular synthesis as their central theme.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.6%
2
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
5
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
7
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
13
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
17
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.6%
21
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
23
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%