Evaluation of the antibody response and adverse reactions of the BNT162b2 vaccine of participants with prior COVID-19 infection in Japan
Mitsunaga, T.; Ohtaki, Y.; Seki, Y.; Yoshioka, M.; Mori, H.; Suzuka, M.; Mashiko, S.; Takeda, S.; Mashiko, K.
Show abstract
IntroductionVaccination programs are important to preventing COVID-19 infection. BNT162b2 is new type of vaccine, and previous studies have shown that the antibody response was significantly elevated in patients with prior COVID-19 infection after the first vaccination. However, no study has evaluated the efficacy of the vaccination or the adverse reactions of people with prior COVID-19 infection in Japan. The aim of this study is to evaluate the antibody titer and adverse reactions of BNT162b2 vaccine among participants with prior COVID-19 infection in Japan. MethodsThe data for this study was collected between April 15, 2021, and June 9, 2021. All of the hospital staff who received the BNT162b2 vaccine were included in this study and were sorted into either the prior infection group or the control group. We collected the data of adverse reactions through self-reporting and calculated the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific antibody titer for all participants. ResultsThe antibody titer of the prior-infection group in first antibody test was significantly higher than that of the control group in the second antibody test. There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the prior infection group receiving its first vaccination and the control group receiving its second vaccination. ConclusionOur study shows that the antibody response following the first vaccination in the prior COVID-19 infection group was found to be comparable to that of the second vaccination in the control group; however, the evaluation of adverse reactions was inadequate and further, large-scale studies are needed.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Systemic adverse effects induced by the BNT162b2 vaccine are associated with higher antibody titers from 3 to 6 months after vaccination 99%
- Age and smoking predict antibody titres at 3 months after the second dose of the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine 97%
- ChAdOx1 n-COV-19 Vaccine Side Effects Among Health Care Workers in Trinidad and Tobago 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 97%
- Acceptance and Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccines: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan 96%
- Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies in vaccinated and vaccine naïve adult Nigerians 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antibody titers against the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta variants of SARS-CoV-2 induced by BNT162b2 vaccination measured using automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay 97%
- Dynamics of anti-Spike IgG antibody level after full BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in health care workers 96%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of the COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Solid Cancer 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccine in lung cancer patients receiving anticancer treatment: A prospective multicenter cohort study 96%
- Factors Associated with the Acceptance and Willingness of COVID-19 Vaccination among Chinese Healthcare Workers 95%
- Gender differences in the determinants of willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine among the working-age population in Japan 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity after booster dose with AZD1222 via intradermal route among adult who had received CoronaVac 96%
- Vaccine-induced humoral and cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2 at 6 months post BNT162b2 vaccination 96%
- A randomized clinical trial of a booster dose with low versus standard dose of AZD1222 in adult after 2 doses of inactivated vaccines 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.