Association of Sociodemographics with Out-of-Pocket Expenditure and Underinsurance in Skin Cancer Survivors
Karim, M. A.; Ohsfeldt, R. L.; Khodakarami, N.; Kum, H.-C.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe sociodemographic predictors of either out-of-pocket expenditure (OOP) or underinsurance among skin cancer survivors is not well reported in the literature. In this study we estimated all-cause healthcare related OOP expenditure and probability of underinsurance among insured skin cancer survivors and identified the sociodemographic predictors of these measures. Data and MethodWe pooled Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data from 2011 to 2015 and identified skin cancer using Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) code. Only adult ([≥]18 years) skin cancer survivors with full year insurance coverage were included in our study (n = 1825). We used a generalized linear model (GLM) with log link and gamma distribution to estimate OOP and a logit model to estimate the probability of underinsurance. We estimated the Average Marginal Effect (AME) to quantify the variations and their statistical significance between reference level and other levels of each predictor. Our analyses accounted for the complex survey design of MEPS. ResultsThe average all-cause OOP was $1766 per person per year for a skin cancer survivor. Among all skin cancer survivors, females, those aged 60-64 years, with some college education or a degree, with income [≥]400% of federal poverty level (FPL) and with non-managed-care private insurance incurred significantly higher OOP expenditure compared to their respective counterparts. In terms of underinsurance, females and those aged 60-64 years had higher probability, whereas, survivors with non-white race/ethnicity and income 200% of FPL or higher had lower probability of being underinsured compared to their respective counterparts. ConclusionOur study demonstrates that OOP expenditure and underinsurance varies significantly by sociodemographic factors among skin cancer survivors.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic inequalities of 3-year survival in formal employees with colorectal cancer between 2012 and 2019 in Colombia 92%
- The impact of worldwide, national and sub-national severity distributions in Burden of Disease studies: a case study of individual cancer types in Scotland 92%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 90%
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 90%
- Age-related differences in cancer relative survival in the US: a SEER-18 analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy January-March 2021 among 18-64 year old US adults by employment and occupation 88%
- Characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccination status among staff and faculty of a large, diverse University in Los Angeles 87%
- Associations of Race/Ethnicity and Other Demographic and Socioeconomic Factors with Vaccine Initiation and Intention During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of a natural disaster on access to care and biopsychosocial outcomes among Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors 92%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 92%
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 92%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 90%
- Surgical candidacy and treatment uptake among women with cervical cancer at public referral hospitals in Kampala, Uganda 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.