Back

Predicting protein domain temperature adaptation across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide

Jensen, S. E.; Johnson, L. C.; Casstevens, T.; Buckler, E. S.

2021-07-13 molecular biology
10.1101/2021.07.13.452245 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein thermostability is important for fitness but difficult to measure across the proteome. Fortunately, protein thermostability is correlated with prokaryote optimal growth temperatures (OGTs), which can be predicted from genome features. Models that can predict temperature sensitivity across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide would help inform how eukaryotes adapt to elevated temperatures, such as those predicted by climate change models. In this study we test whether prediction models can cross the prokaryote-eukaryote divide to predict protein stability in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. We compare models built using a) the whole proteome, b) Pfam domains, and c) individual amino acid residues. Proteome-wide models accurately predict prokaryote optimal growth temperatures (r2 up to 0.93), while site-specific models demonstrate that nearly half of the proteome is associated with optimal growth temperature in both Archaea and Bacteria. Comparisons with the small number of eukaryotes with temperature sensitivity data suggest that site-specific models are the most transferable across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide. Using the site-specific models, we evaluated temperature sensitivity for 323,850 amino acid residues in 2,088 Pfam domain clusters in Archaea and Bacteria species separately. 59.0% of tested residues are significantly associated with OGT in Archaea and 75.2% of tested residues are significantly associated with OGT in Bacteria species at a 5% false discovery rate. These models make it possible to identify which Pfam domains and amino acid residues are involved in temperature adaptation and facilitate future research questions about how species will fare in the face of increasing environmental temperatures.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.