The Comparison Of Three Real-Time PCR Kits For SARS-COV-2 Diagnosis Reveals Discrepancies On The Identification Of Positive COVID-19 Cases And Dispersion On The Values Obtained For The Detection Of SARS-COV-2 Variants
Santibanez, A.; Luraschi, R.; Barrera-Avalos, C.; Vallejos-Vidal, E.; Alarcon, J.; Cayunao, J.; Mella, A.; Figueroa, M.; Hernandez, F.; Plaza, B.; Inostroza-Molina, A.; Valdes, D.; Imarai, M.; Acuna-Castillo, C.; Reyes-Lopez, F. E.; Sandino, A. M.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a huge challenge and threat to public health throughout the world population. Reverse transcription associated with real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) has been the gold-standard molecular tool for diagnosis and detection of the SARS-CoV-2. Currently, it is used as the main strategy for testing, traceability, and control of positive cases For this reason, the on-top high demand for reagents has produced stock-out on several occasions and the only alternative to keep population diagnosis has been the use of different RT-qPCR kits. Therefore, we evaluate the performance of three of the commercial RT-qPCR kits currently in use for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in Chile, consisting in: TaqMan 2019-nCoV Assay Kit v1 (Thermo). Real-Time Fluorescent RT-PCR Kit for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 (BGI), and LightCycler(R) Multiplex RNA Virus Master (Roche). Results of quantification cycle (Cq) and relative fluorescence units (RFU) obtained from their RT-qPCR reactions revealed important discrepancies on the total RNA required for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 genes and diagnosis. Marked differences between kits in samples with 30>Cq value< 34 was observed. Samples with positive diagnoses for Covid-19 using the Thermo Fisher kit had different results when the same samples were evaluated with Roche and BGI kits. The displacement on the Cq value for SARS-CoV-2 identification between the three different RT-qPCR kits was also evident when the presence of single nucleotide variants was evaluated in the context of genomic surveillance. Taken together, this study emphasizes the special care adjusting RT-qPCR reaction conditions of the different kits must be taken by all the laboratories before carrying out the detection of SARS-CoV-2 genes from total RNA nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) samples.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Evaluation of AccuPower® COVID-19 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower® SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Kit for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Sputum, NPS/OPS, Saliva and Pooled Samples 97%
- Validation of a Novel Molecular Assay to the Diagnostic of COVID-19 Based on Real Time PCR with High Resolution Melting 95%
- Evaluation of silver nanoparticles for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health workers: in vitro and in vivo 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis Of Four Different Transport And Preservation Medium Kits For SARS-COV-2 Diagnosis From Nasopharyngeal Swab By Real-Time PCR: Adapting To The Constantly Increasing Demand Of Sampling Processing And Stock-Outs During The Pandemic 98%
- Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Human Biofluids Using the Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay: A Prospective Diagnostic Study in Fortaleza, Brazil 94%
- Evaluation of seven different rapid methods for nucleic acid detection of SARS-COV-2 virus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A simple RNA preparation method for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR 94%
- Development and validation of cost-effective one-step multiplex RT-PCR assay for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 infection using SYBR Green melting curve analysis 94%
- A Paper-based Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.