Making Strides in Doctoral-Level Career Outcomes Reporting: Surveying the Landscape of Classification and Visualization Methodologies and Creating a Crosswalk Tool
Collins, T.; Ramadoss, D.; Layton, R.; MacDonald, J.; Wheeler, R.; Bankston, A.; Stayart, C. A.; Hao, Y.; Robinson-Hamm, J.; Sinche, M.; Burghart, S.; Carlsen-Bryan, A.; Eswara, P.; Krasna, H.; Xu, H.; Sullivan, M.
Show abstract
The recent movement underscoring the importance of career taxonomies has helped usher in a new era of transparency in PhD career outcomes. The convergence of discipline-specific organizational movements, interdisciplinary collaborations, and federal initiatives have all helped to increase PhD career outcomes tracking and reporting. Transparent and publicly available PhD career outcomes are being used by institutions to attract top applicants, as prospective graduate students are factoring these in when deciding on the program and institution in which to enroll for their PhD studies. Given the increasing trend to track PhD career outcomes, the number of institutional efforts and supporting offices for these studies have increased, as has the variety of methods being used to classify and report/visualize outcomes. This report identifies and summarizes currently available PhD career taxonomy tools, resources, and visualization options to help catalyze and empower institutions to develop and publish their own PhD career outcomes. Similar fields between taxonomies were mapped to create a new crosswalk tool. This work serves as an empirical review of the career outcome tracking systems available and highlights organizations, consortia, and funding agencies that are impacting policy change toward greater transparency in PhD career outcomes reporting.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Stakeholder Insights to Enhance Engagement in PhD Professional Development 95%
- Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States 95%
- Factors and mediators impacting the number of undergraduate research mentees at a research-intensive Hispanic-serving institution 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Assessment of a Sustainable PhD Internship Program Supporting Diverse Biomedical Career Outcomes 97%
- Analysis of NIH K99/R00 Awards and the Career Progression of Awardees 95%
- Female-dominated disciplines have lower evaluated research quality and funding success rates, for men and women 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Learning Barriers and Opportunities for Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Learners in Career and Professional Skill Development: A Case Study 95%
- PROPEL: a scalable model for postbaccalaureate training to promote diversity in the biomedical workforce 95%
- Flying in the Face of Adversity: A Drosophila-based Virtual CURE Provides Semester-long Authentic Research Opportunity to the Flipped Classroom. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.