Development and Validation of a Multivariable Risk Prediction Model for Sudden Cardiac Death after Myocardial Infarction (PROFID Risk Model): Study Rationale, Design and Protocol
Martin, G. P.; Hindricks, G.; Akbarov, A.; Kapacee, Z.; Parkes, L. M.; Motmedi-Ghahfarokhi, G.; Ng, S.; Sprague, D.; Taleb, Y.; Ong, M.; Longato, E.; Miller, C. A.; Shamloo, A. S.; Albert, C.; Barthel, P.; Boveda, S.; Braunschweig, F.; Johansen, J. B.; Cook, N.; de Chillou, C.; Elders, P.; Faxen, J.; Friede, T.; Fusini, L.; Gale, C. P.; Jarkovsky, J.; Jouven, X.; Junttila, J.; Kiviniemi, A.; Kutyifa, V.; Lee, D.; Leigh, J.; Lenarczyk, R.; Leyva, F.; Maeng, M.; Manca, A.; Marijon, E.; Marschall, U.; Vinayagamoorthy, M.; Nielsen, J. C.; Olsen, T.; Pester, J.; Pontone, G.; Schmidt, G.; Schwartz,
Show abstract
IntroductionSudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of death in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) and can be prevented by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Currently, risk stratification for SCD and decision on ICD implantation are based solely on impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, this strategy leads to over- and under-treatment of patients because LVEF alone is insufficient for accurate assessment of prognosis. Thus, there is a need for better risk stratification. This is the study protocol for developing and validating a prediction model for risk of SCD in patients with prior MI. Methods and AnalysisThe EU funded PROFID project will analyse 23 datasets from Europe, Israel and the US ([~]225,000 observations). The datasets include patients with prior MI or ischemic cardiomyopathy with reduced LVEF<50%, with and without a primary prevention ICD. Our primary outcome is SCD in patients without an ICD, or appropriate ICD therapy in patients carrying an ICD as a SCD surrogate. For analysis, we will stack 18 of the datasets into a single database (datastack), with the remaining analysed remotely for data governance reasons (remote data). We will apply 5 analytical approaches to develop the risk prediction model in the datastack and the remote datasets, all under a competing risk framework: 1) Weibull model, 2) flexible parametric survival model, 3) random forest, 4) likelihood boosting machine, and 5) neural network. These dataset-specific models will be combined into a single model (one per analysis method) using model aggregation methods, which will be externally validated using systematic leave-one-dataset-out cross-validation. Predictive performance will be pooled using random effects meta-analysis to select the model with best performance. Ethics and disseminationLocal ethical approval was obtained. The final model will be disseminated through scientific publications and a web-calculator. Statistical code will be published through open-source repositories.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 94%
- RESEARCH PROTOCOL: Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases for type 2 diabetes mellitus 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Actionable absolute risk prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a behavior-management approach based on data from 464,547 UK Biobank participants 94%
- Latent class regression improves the predictive acuity and clinical utility of survival prognostication amongst chronic heart failure patients. 93%
- An assessment of the value of deep neural networks in genetic risk prediction for surgically relevant outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 94%
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 94%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and treatment compliance after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in France, the STOP SCA+ study 94%
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 92%
- Algorithm for Predicting Valvular Heart Disease from Heart Sounds in an Unselected Cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 94%
- The HeartMagic prospective observational study protocol - characterizing subtypes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction 93%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.