Back

Comparison of Two Genome-Wide Association Studies for Heart Rate Response to Exercise from the UK Biobank

Thakral, A.; Paterson, A. D.

2021-07-09 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2021.07.07.21259806 medRxiv
Show abstract

The short-term changes in heart rate (HR) during and after exercise are important physiologic traits mediated via the autonomic nervous system. Variations in these traits are associated with mortality from cardiovascular causes. We conducted a systematic review of genome-wide association studies for these traits (with >10,000 participants) with the aim of comparing Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) from different studies. Additionally, we applied the STrengthening of Reporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA) statement for assessing the completeness of reporting of evidence. Our systematic search yielded two studies (Verweij et al. and Ramirez et al.) that met our inclusion criteria. Both were conducted on the UK Biobank. Both defined their exercise traits as the difference between resting HR and the maximum HR during exercise. Their recovery traits were defined differently. Verweij et al. defined 5 recovery traits as the differences between the peak HR during exercise and the HRs at 10-50 sec post exercise cessation. Ramirez et al. defined their recovery trait as the difference between peak HR during exercise and the minimum HR during the minute post exercise cessation. While Ramirez et al. divided their sample into discovery and replication subsets, Verweij et al. analyzed the whole sample together. In terms of results, there were several common SNPs identified between studies and traits. There was evidence for the phenomenon of winners curse operating for a SNP from the Ramirez studys HR recovery analysis. Many of the SNPs were mutually exclusive between the studies. However, there was a good agreement of PRS from the studies. The differences in the results could be attributed to the different exclusion criteria, analytic approaches, and definitions of traits used. Both studies had an under-representation of individuals of non-European ancestry compared to those of European ancestry. Further studies with proportionate representation of individuals of all ancestries would help address this gap. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=183 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/21259806v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (55K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@134bf11org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ec23deorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@26f712org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@26d148_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
3
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
5
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
11
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
13
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
21
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
28
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
30
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%