Back

Proxalutamide Improves Lung Injury in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients - an Analysis of the Radiological Findings of the Proxa-Rescue AndroCoV Trial

Cadegiani, F. A.; Fonseca, D. N.; Correia, M. N.; Barros, R. N.; Onety, D. C.; Israel, K. C. P.; Guerreiro, E. O.; Medeiros, J. E. M.; Nicolau, R. N.; Nicolau, L. F. M.; Cunha, R. X.; Barroco, M. F. R.; Silva, P. S.; Paulain, R. W.; Thompson, C. E.; Zimerman, R. A.; Wambier, C. G.; Goren, A.

2021-09-08 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.07.01.21259656 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAntiandrogens are candidates against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) due to host cell entry inhibition by the suppression of TMPRSS2. Proxalutamide is a nonsteroidal anti-androgen (NSAA) with strong antagonism on androgen receptor (AR) and angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). Efficacy of proxalutamide was previously demonstrated for early COVID-19 outpatients, and also reduction of deaths in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Whether radiological changes would follow the improvement in clinical outcomes with proxalutamide is not established. The present post-hoc analysis aims to evaluate whether proxalutamide improves lung injury observed through chest computerized tomography (CT) scans. MethodsThis is a post-hoc analysis of the radiological findings of The Proxa-Rescue AndroCoV Trial with all enrolled patients from the three participating institutions of the city of Manaus, Brazil, that had at least two chest CT scans during hospitalization. The quantification of lung parenchyma involvement was performed by blinded radiologists with expertise in analysis of COVID-19 images. A first chest CT scan was performed upon randomization and a second CT scan was performed approximately five days later, whenever feasible. Improvement rate was the first endpoint, and relative and absolute changes between the first and second CT scans were the second endpoints. ResultsOf the 395 patients initially evaluated, 77 and 169 patients from the proxalutamide and placebo arms, respectively, were included (n=246). Baseline characteristics and percentage of lung parenchyma affected in the baseline chest CT scan were similar between groups. In the second chest CT scan, the percentage of lungs affected (Median - IQR) was 35.0% (25.0-57.5%) in the proxalutamide group versus 67.5% (50.0-80.0%) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). The absolute and relative change between the second and first chest CT scans (Median - IQR) were -15.0 percent points (p.p.) (-30.0 - 0.0p.p.) and -25.0% (-50.0 - 0.0%) in the proxalutamide group, respectively, and +15.0p.p. (0.0 - +30.0p.p.) and +32.7% (0.0 - +80.0%) in the placebo group, respectively (p < 0.001 for both absolute and relative changes). The improvement rate, i.e., the percentage of subjects that had improvement from the first to the second CT scan, was 72.3% in the proxalutamide group and 23.1% in the placebo group (p < 0.0001), with an improvement rate ratio (95%CI) of 3.15 (2.32 - 4.28). ConclusionProxalutamide improves lung opacities in hospitalized COVID-19 patients when compared to placebo. (NCT04728802)

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
3
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
Infectious Diseases
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.4%
7
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
11
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
22
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
Pharmacological Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%