Back

Perceptions and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant and lactating women in Singapore: A cross-sectional study

Jayagobi, P. A.; Ong, C.; Yeo, K. T.; Lim, C. C.; Seet, M. J.; Kwek, L. K.; Ku, C. W.; Chan, J.; Mathur, M.; Chua, M. C.

2021-07-04 public and global health
10.1101/2021.06.29.21259741 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionVaccination is critical in controlling the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, vaccine perception and acceptance among pregnant and lactating women is unknown in Singapore. We aimed to determine the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination among these two groups of women in Singapore, and factors associated with vaccine acceptance. MethodsWe conducted an anonymous, online survey on the perception and acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant and lactating women at a tertiary hospital in Singapore from 1st March to 31st May 2021. Information on demographics and knowledge were collected, and these factors were assessed for their relationship with vaccine acceptance. ResultsA total of 201 pregnant and 207 lactating women participated. Vaccine acceptance rates in pregnant and lactating women were 30.3% and 16.9% respectively. Pregnant women who were unsure or unwilling to take the vaccine cited concerns about safety of the vaccine during pregnancy (92.9%), while lactating women were concerned about potential long-term negative effects on the breastfeeding child (75.6%). Other factors significantly associated with vaccine acceptance included a lower monthly household income or education level, appropriate knowledge regarding vaccine mechanism and higher perceived maternal risk of COVID-19. Most pregnant (70.0%) and lactating women (83.7%) were willing to take the vaccine only when more safety data during pregnancy and breastfeeding were available. ConclusionsCOVID-19 vaccine acceptance was low among pregnant and lactating women in Singapore. Addressing safety concerns when more data is available and education on mechanism of vaccine action will likely improve acceptance among these women.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
2
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
4
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.3%
5
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
7
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
15
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
27
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%