Back

Examining spousal and family support as predictors of long-term weight loss and remission of type 2 diabetes following bariatric surgery

Tan, E. Y.; Lee, P. C.; Tham, K. W.; Ganguly, S.; Lim, C. H.; Liu, J. C.

2021-07-03 endocrinology
10.1101/2021.06.27.21259510 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPostoperative outcomes vary considerably across bariatric patients and may be related to psychosocial factors. In this study, we examined whether a patients family support predicts weight loss and the remission of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) up to 5 years following surgery. MethodsBetween 2008 to 2018, 359 patients completed a pre-surgical questionnaire before undergoing gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. As part of the questionnaire, patients described their family support in terms of structure (marital status, number of family members in the household) and function (marriage satisfaction, family emotional support, family practical support). These were applied as predictors to percent total weight loss (%TWL) and T2DM remission at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years following surgery. ResultsMarital satisfaction was found to be a significant predictor of post-surgical weight trajectories. Namely, patients who reported higher marital satisfaction were more likely to sustain weight loss than patients who reported lower marital satisfaction ({beta} = 0.92, SE = 0.37, p = 0.02). ConclusionsGiven the link between marital support and long-term weight outcomes, providers could consider asking patients about their spousal relationships during pre-surgical counselling. Key Points Psychosocial factors may influence postoperative outcomes Family support was examined as a predictor of weight loss and type 2 diabetes Marital satisfaction significantly predicted post-surgical weight trajectories

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.