Population disruption: estimating changes in population distribution in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic
Gibbs, H.; Waterlow, N. R.; Cheshire, J.; Danon, L.; Liu, Y.; Grundy, C.; Kucharski, A. J.; LSHTM CMMID COVID-19 Working Group, ; Eggo, R. M.
Show abstract
Mobility data have demonstrated major changes in human movement patterns in response to COVID-19 and associated interventions in many countries. This can involve sub-national redistribution, short-term relocations as well as international migration. In this paper, we combine detailed location data from Facebook measuring the location of approximately 6 million daily active Facebook users in 5km2 tiles in the UK with census-derived population estimates to measure population mobility and redistribution. We provide time-varying population estimates and assess spatial population changes with respect to population density and four key reference dates in 2020 (First lockdown, End of term, Beginning of term, Christmas). We also show how population estimates derived from the distribution of Facebook users vary compared to mid-2020 small area population estimates by the UK national statistics agencies. We estimate that between March 2020 and March 2021, the total population of the UK declined and we identify important spatial variations in this population change, showing that low-density areas have experienced lower population decreases than urban areas. We estimate that, for the top 10% highest population tiles, the population has decreased by 6.6%. Further, we provide evidence that geographic redistributions of population within the UK coincide with dates of non-pharmaceutical interventions including lockdowns and movement restrictions, as well as seasonal patterns of migration around holiday dates. The methods used in this study reveal significant changes in population distribution at high spatial and temporal resolutions that have not previously been quantified by available demographic surveys in the UK. We found early indicators of potential longer-term changes in the population distribution of the UK although it is not clear if these changes may persist after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Deep Recurrent Reinforced Learning model to compare the efficacy of targeted local vs. national measures on the spread of COVID-19 in the UK 91%
- Adoption and continued use of mobile contact tracing technology: Multilevel explanations from a three-wave panel survey and linked data 90%
- A geotemporal survey of hospital bed saturation across England during the first wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Disentangling the rhythms of human activity in the built environment for airborne transmission risk: a large-scale analysis of mobility data 90%
- Association of close-range contact patterns with SARS-CoV-2: a household transmission study 90%
- Genomic epidemiology of COVID-19 in care homes in the East of England 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Time varying association between deprivation, ethnicity and SARS-CoV-2 infections in England: a space-time study 91%
- The Omicron SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in England during February 2022 90%
- Evaluating social and spatial inequalities of large scale rapid lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in COVID-19 management: An observational study of Liverpool, UK (November 2020 to January 2021) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.