The majority of the variation in COVID-19 rates between nations is explained by median age, obesity rate, and island status
Fraiman, J. B.; Ludwin-Peery, E.; Ludwin-Peery, S.
Show abstract
Since the World Health Organization declared SARS-CoV-2 to be a global pandemic on March 11, 2020, nearly every nation on earth has reported infections. Incidence and prevalence of COVID-19 case rates have demonstrated extreme geospatial and temporal variability across the globe. The outbreaks in some countries are extreme and devastating, while other countries face outbreaks that are relatively minor. The causes of these differences between nations remain poorly understood, and identifying the factors that underlie this variation is critical to understand the dynamics of this disease in order to better respond to this and future pandemics. Here, we examine four factors that we anticipated would explain much of the variation in COVID-19 rates between nations: median age, obesity rate, island status, and strength of border closure measures. Clinical evidence suggests that age and obesity increase both the likelihood of infection and transmission in individual patients, which make them plausible demographic factors. The third factor, whether or not each country is an island nation, was selected because the geographical isolation of islands is expected to influence COVID-19 transmission. The fourth factor of border closure was selected because of its anticipated interaction with island nation status. Together, these four variables are able to explain a majority of the international variance in COVID-19 case rates. Using a dataset of 190 countries, simple modeling based on these four factors and their interactions explains more than 70% of the total variance between countries. With additional covariates, more complex modeling and higher-order interactions explains more than 80% of the variance. These novel findings offer a solution to explain the unusual global variation of COVID-19 that has remained largely elusive throughout the pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- covid19.Explorer : A web application and R package to explore United States COVID-19 data 92%
- COVID-19 induced birth sex ratio changes in England and Wales 91%
- Exploratory Study to Characterise the Individual Types of Health Literacy and Beliefs and Their Associations with Infection Prevention Behaviours amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: A Longitudinal Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The World Mortality Dataset: Tracking excess mortality across countries during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Population mobility and the development of Botswana’s generalized HIV epidemic: a network analysis 91%
- Lack of ownership of mobile phones could hinder the rollout of mHealth interventions in Africa 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of Elastic Net Regression for Modeling COVID-19 Sociodemographic Risk Factors 95%
- Virtual reality as a tool for environmental conservation and fundraising 92%
- Does the Data Tell the True Story? A Modelling Study of Early COVID-19 Pandemic Suppression and Mitigation Strategies in Ghana 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the effectiveness of COVID-19 restrictions and lockdowns: Pan metron ariston 93%
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 90%
- The relative effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on early Covid-19 mortality: natural experiment in 130 countries 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.