Impact of AI-based Real Time Image Quality Feedback for Chest Radiographs in the Clinical Routine
Poggenborg, J.; Yaroshenko, A.; Wieberneit, N.; Harder, T.; Gossmann, A.
Show abstract
PurposeTo implement a tool for real time image quality feedback for chest radiographs into the clinical routine and to evaluate the effect of the system on the image quality of the acquired radiographs. Materials and MethodsA real time Artificial Intelligence (AI) image quality feedback tool is developed that analyzes chest PA x-rays right after the completion of the examination at the x-ray system and provides visual feedback to the system operator with respect to adherence to desired standards of collimation, patient rotation and inspiration. In order to track image quality changes over time, results were compared to image quality assessment for images, acquired prior to system implementation. ResultsCompared to the image quality prior to the installation of the real time image quality feedback solution, it is shown that a relative increase of images with optimal image quality with respect to collimation, patient rotation and inspiration is achieved by 30% (p<0.01). A relative improvement of 28% (p<0.01) is observed for the increase of images with optimal collimation, followed by a relative increase of 4% (p<0.01) of images with optimal inspiration. Finally, a detailed analysis is presented that shows that the average unnecessarily exposed area is reduced by 34% (p<0.01). DiscussionThis study shows that it is possible to significantly improve image quality using a real time AI-based image quality feedback tool. The developed tool not only provides objective and impartial criticism and helps x-ray operators identify areas for improvement, but also gives positive feedback. Key FindingsO_LIA substantial amount of images acquired in the clinical routine does not suffice the international guidelines C_LIO_LIContinuous AI-based image quality feedback to the x-ray system operator in the clinical routine leads to a significant image quality improvement over time C_LIO_LIUsing the developed tool, the overall fraction of images with optimal patient positioning could be improved by 30%, followed by a 34% decrease of unnecessarily exposed area. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigated ultrasound bronchoscopy with integrated positron emission tomography - A human feasibility study 95%
- Early user experience and lessons learned using ultra-portable digital X-ray with computer-aided detection (DXR-CAD) products: A qualitative study from the perspective of healthcare providers 95%
- National diagnostic reference levels for digital diagnostic and screening mammography in Uganda. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 94%
- A Cross-sectional Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Usability and Efficacy of “Swaasa”: An AI-Platform for Rapid Respiratory Health Assessment 92%
- COVID-Classifier: An automated machine learning model to assist in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in chest x-ray images 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 94%
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 94%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 94%
- First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low dose quantitative spectral imaging 94%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 95%
- Comparing performance of deep convolutional neural network with orthopaedic surgeons on identification of total hip prosthesis design from plain radiographs 90%
- Phase Recognition in Contrast-Enhanced CT Scans based on Deep Learning and Random Sampling 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.