How perception and attention participate in reading skill?
Gudwani, S.; Mehta, M.; Sagar, R.; Behari, M.; Narang, V.; Dwivedi, S.; Jagannathan, N. R.; Kumaran, S. S.
Show abstract
Reading creates accessibility to the outer world information and is an integral skill for academic achievement. It involves visual perception, reasoning at symbolic level (text reading) and phonological processing. But does perception, visuospatial processing at pre-symbolic level affect reading skill? To understand and untangle the mechanism fifty children with reading problem (developmental dyslexia, DDC) and twentyfive age-matched typical readers (healthy controls, HC) were studied. In DDC, the variable-performance of non-symbolic visual search (pictorial-level) was associated with bilateral brain activity (functional MRI) of ventral stream (inferior occipital and fusiform) and greater involvement of frontal-prefrontal regions, suggesting the modified dorsal route-gating for figure-ground filtering. Performance variability in picture-concept reasoning (71.9% and significant group mean difference) and visuospatial-organization (51.3%) of DDC children indicate attentional or executive differences at nonsymbolic level. In symbolic discrimination performance, no significant difference observed for single alphabet or number (digit) reading but significant differences at word level for visual and phonological performance (considering orthographic differences), attributes to distractor-inhibition problems. Nonsymbolic to symbolic coding/decoding speed and writing error (copying) differences are suggestive of execution variability rather than motor coordination in DDC. In HC, the top-down dorsal route gating and hypoactivity induced in right frontal-anterior cingulate cortices, play a major role in reading by allocating spatial attention and inhibiting distractors. It has been elaborated in the "neurobiological model". How perception and attention participate in reading skill?O_ST_ABSResearch HighlightsC_ST_ABSO_LIVisuospatial attention, executive control (nonsymbolic level) and visual discrimination (symbolic level) performance contribute to reading. C_LIO_LIIn children with reading problems (dyslexia) pictorial visual processing task (fMRI) recruited higher activation in right hemispheric frontal, inferior parietal and anterior cingulate regions. C_LIO_LIBilateral activation of occipital-striate, extra-striate, fusiform for nonsymbolic is associated with significantly more errors at bigger-symbol-string, in dyslexia. C_LIO_LIAuditory discrimination differences in shallow-deep orthography. C_LIO_LICorrelation of non-symbolic executive and symbolic performances. C_LIO_LIRole of the prelexical visual perception and dorsal-route gating in reading skill explained as neurobiological model. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebral laterality for writing in right- and left-handers: A functional transcranial Doppler ultrasound study 94%
- Investigating Frontoparietal Networks and Activation in Children with Mathematics Learning Difficulties: Cases with Different Deficit Profiles 93%
- Neurofunctional basis underlying audiovisual integration of print and speech sound in Chinese children 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Atypical relationships between neurofunctional features of print-sound integration and reading abilities in Chinese children with dyslexia 95%
- Neural correlates in the time course of inferences: costs and benefits for less-skilled readers at university level. 93%
- Frequency Effects on Spelling Error Recognition: An ERP Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter connectivity in uncinate fasciculus accounts for visual attention span in developmental dyslexia 94%
- Distinctive neural correlates of phonological processing and reading impairment in fetal alcohol-exposed adolescents with and without facial dysmorphology 92%
- An ERP investigation of accented isolated single word processing 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.