Gut Bacterial Microbiome Profiles Associated with Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Russ, C. A.; Zertalis, N. A.; Nanton, V.
Show abstract
ObjectiveRecent studies have shown a potential link between gut microbiome and colorectal cancer (CRC). Initially, a wide array of research into this topic was discovered from the past decade, illustrating a keen interest in the potential causal relationship between the gut microbiome and CRC. However, the cancer research community is lacking a summarised systematic review of this kind which aims to explore the evidence linking the human gut microbiome to risk of CRC. DesignThis systematic review was carried out with two independent reviewers assessing the database outcomes from Medline and EMBASE during May 2020. A meta-analysis was undertaken studying the link between Helicobacter pylori and CRC; processed through Stata. Results31 papers were included in the systematic review, followed by 12 for the meta-analysis. From these papers, Fusobacterium and Bacteroides were reported most frequently as enriched in CRC versus control. The meta-analysis showed an Odds Ratio of 1.49 (95% CI 1.19 - 1.86), including a total of 20,001 events. This meta-analysis concluded that H. pylori infection significantly increases the risk of CRC, albeit with evidence of publication bias. ConclusionsBacteria have been discovered to increase the risk of CRC, however a definitive causal relationship cannot be concluded or excluded using case-control studies. To fully understand the potential link of the bacteria listed, alterations in research design and execution are required. The assessment found a need for a large-scale cohort study conducted over a significant period of time to thoroughly evaluate the potential relationship between gut microbiome and CRC risk. O_TEXTBOXSignificance of studyWhat is already known on this subject? [tpltrtarr]Roughly 10% of all cancer deaths in the UK are attributed to colorectal cancer (CRC), with CRC being the third most common cancer worldwide. [tpltrtarr]The risk of developing CRC has been closely linked to the composition of the gut microbiome [tpltrtarr]H. pylori is a known causative agent of gastric cancer What are the new findings? [tpltrtarr]To the best of the researchers knowledge, this is the first systematic review of this type conducted into this topic, investigating the genera/species of bacteria in the human gut microbiome and the risk of CRC. [tpltrtarr]This systematic review found a strong association between Fusobacterium and Bacteroides, amongst other species, and CRC. [tpltrtarr]The meta-analysis found a significant link between H. pylori infection and increased risk of CRC. How might this impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future? [tpltrtarr]This systematic review provides potentially actionable evidence in the personalised management of patients to reduce their risk of CRC. [tpltrtarr]This review has highlighted the need for a large population prospective cohort study, with standardised sampling methods. [tpltrtarr]The meta-analysis reinforces the importance of H. pylori testing and eradication in those deemed at high risk of CRC C_TEXTBOX
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Metagenomic analysis of colonic tissue and stool microbiome in patients with colorectal cancer in a South Asian population 95%
- PDAC-ANN: an artificial neural network to predict Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma based on gene expression 91%
- Comparative Immune profiling in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Progression Among South African patients 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The urinary microbiome in association with diabetes and diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review 94%
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 93%
- Comparative effectiveness of probiotic-based formulations on cecal microbiota modulation in broilers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal study of blood microbiome responses to milk reintroduction in healthy volunteers: A prospective, single-arm crossover study protocol 92%
- Erroneous risks in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions during data extraction in evidence synthesis practice: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 89%
- Power calculations for detecting differences in efficacy of fecal microbiota donors 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- p16 Expression and its correlation with the clinical pathological characteristics of cervical cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-Analysis 92%
- Cohort profile: The Swedish Inception Cohort in inflammatory bowel disease (SIC-IBD) 91%
- International Prevalence Of Consultation With A Naturopathic Practitioner: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gut MicrobiotAware: how much do we know about gut microbiota? An international questionnaire. 94%
- Digital Therapeutics Care Utilizing Genetic and Gut Microbiome Signals for the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Results from a Preliminary Retrospective Study 93%
- Restriction of the growth and biofilm formation of ESKAPE pathogens by caprine gut-derived probiotic bacteria 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.