Clinical performance of two EUA-approved anti-COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid lateral flow immunoassays using whole blood finger-sticks
Tagwerker, C.; Baig, I.; Brunson, E.; Mundo, K.; Dutra-Smith, D.; Carias-Marines, M. J.; de Zoysa, R. S.; Smith, D. J.
Show abstract
Serological, or antibody, tests detect immunoglobulins produced by the hosts plasma B cells following exposure to foreign antigens. Venipuncture blood draws to collect human venous whole blood, plasma from anticoagulated blood (Li+ heparin, K2EDTA and sodium citrate), or serum are commonly utilized and require refrigerated temperatures during transport to the testing facility. Subsequent laboratory testing by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) or chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA) can take an additional 2-5 hours. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) to be used in point-of-care (POC) and remote settings have become essential during mandatory quarantine and isolation periods. RDTs allowed for more cost-effective testing using less collection materials with an immediate (5-10 minutes) test result. However, the majority of emerging RDTs receiving Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for qualitative detection and differentiation of IgM and IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were only approved for use in human venous whole blood, plasma or serum. In this study we summarize performance characteristics of one RDT (COVID-19 IgG/IgM lateral flow immunoassay rapid cassette) to another by simultaneous application of whole blood finger-stick specimens (n = 32). The study was performed over 5 different days, with daily quality controls consisting of serum previously verified to be positive or negative by COVID-19 IgG/IgM ELISA testing.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A High-throughput Microsphere-based Immunoassay of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM Testing for COVID-19 Diagnostics 96%
- Development And Performance Evaluation of A Rapid In-House ELISA for Retrospective Serosurveillance of SARS-CoV-2 96%
- Development and Evaluation of Two Rapid Indigenous IgG-ELISA immobilized with ACE-2 Binding Peptides for Detection Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of three rapid lateral flow antigen detection tests for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection 95%
- Clinical evaluation of the molecular-based BD SARS-CoV-2/Flu for the BD MAX™ System 95%
- Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of commercial qPCR kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples 95%
- A simple, cost-effective and extraction-free molecular diagnostic test for sickle cell disease in noninvasive buccal swab specimen for a limited-resource setting 94%
- Evaluation and modelling of the performance of an automated SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay according to sample type, target population and epidemic trends 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the false positive rate of highly automated SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing 95%
- Performance of Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 rapid nucleic acid amplification test in nasopharyngeal swabs transported in viral media and dry nasal swabs, in a New York City academic institution 94%
- Test Agreement Between Roche Cobas 6800 and Cepheid GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays at High Cycle Threshold Ranges 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation and Performance Comparison of Three SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays 96%
- Evaluation of seven different rapid methods for nucleic acid detection of SARS-COV-2 virus 95%
- Clinical evaluation of an automated, rapid mariPOC ® antigen test in screening of symptomatics and asymptomatics for SARS-CoV-2 infections 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.