Normal mean oral temperature is 98F, not 98.2F or 98.6F
Kumar, N.; Ronanki, K.; Panda, P. K.; Kapoor, M.; Singh, Y.; Bhadoria, A. S.
Show abstract
Background98.6{degrees}F is generally accepted as normal body temperature as defined by Wunderlich (1868) and later challenged by Mackowiak (1992) and Protsiv (2020) who concluded as 98.2{degrees}F based on cross-sectional studies. Hence, the normal body temperature at present needs quantification? MethodsA longitudinal study on the healthy population of Northen-India were followed-up over 1-year. Participants were advised for self-monitoring of oral temperature with a standard digital thermometer in either left or right sublingual pocket and record it in the thermometry diary. The study was considered complete if the participant had all the three phases of the study (i.e. non-febrile, febrile, and post-febrile phases) or completed the duration of the study. ResultsThe mean oral temperature of the participants (n=144) during the non-febrile and post-febrile phases (temperature readings=6543) were 98{degrees}F (SD, 0.61) and 98.01{degrees}F (SD, 0.60) respectively (P<0.001). The mean oral temperature during post-febrile phase was found to be 0.01{degrees}F higher than non-febrile phase. With the diurnal variability, the morning (AM), noon (AN), and afternoon (PM) mean temperatures were 97.91, 98.08, and 98.27{degrees}F (P<0.001) respectively during the non-febrile phase. Similar trends were observed in variability among men and women, and seasons. ConclusionsThe mean oral temperature is 98{degrees}F (SD, 0.61). The temperature is as low as 96.90F and as high as 99.10F. The temperature during post-febrile phase was found to be higher than the non-febrile phase temperature like PM over AN & AM, women over men, summer over other seasons in the non-febrile phase, spring over others in the post-febrile phase.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Stress-mediating Inflammatory Cytokine Profiling Reveals Unique Patterns in Malaria and Typhoid Fever Patients 95%
- Characteristics and outcome profile of Hospitalized African COVID-19 patients: The Ethiopian Context 95%
- Serological evidence and factors associated to liver damage in malaria-typhoid infected patients consulting in two health facilities, Yaoundé-Cameroon 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability and associated factors of indoor residual spraying for Malaria control by households in Luangwa district of Zambia: A multilevel analysis 94%
- Caregivers’ perception of risk for malaria, helminth infection and malaria-helminth co-infection among children living in urban and rural settings of Senegal: a qualitative study 94%
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does skin surface temperature variation account for Buruli ulcer lesion distribution? 95%
- Proportion of paediatric admissions with any stage of noma at the Anka General Hospital, northwest Nigeria 94%
- Health-Related Quality of Life of Adults with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis at ALERT Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological And Clinical Characteristics Of COVID-19 Patients In Kenya 93%
- Seroprevalence and associated factors of maternal cytomegalovirus in Southern Ethiopia 93%
- Exploring the Role of Microbiome in Susceptibility, Treatment Response and Outcome among Tuberculosis Patients from Pakistan; Study Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study (Micro-STOP) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternal Factors Promoting Normal Linear Growth of Children from Impoverished Rwandan Households 93%
- Level Of Food Consumption Score And Associated Factors Among Pregnant Women At Shegaw Motta Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. 93%
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding hepatitis B virus among healthcare workers in Beira City, Mozambique 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.