Back

Normal mean oral temperature is 98F, not 98.2F or 98.6F

Kumar, N.; Ronanki, K.; Panda, P. K.; Kapoor, M.; Singh, Y.; Bhadoria, A. S.

2021-06-05 public and global health
10.1101/2021.06.03.21258282 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background98.6{degrees}F is generally accepted as normal body temperature as defined by Wunderlich (1868) and later challenged by Mackowiak (1992) and Protsiv (2020) who concluded as 98.2{degrees}F based on cross-sectional studies. Hence, the normal body temperature at present needs quantification? MethodsA longitudinal study on the healthy population of Northen-India were followed-up over 1-year. Participants were advised for self-monitoring of oral temperature with a standard digital thermometer in either left or right sublingual pocket and record it in the thermometry diary. The study was considered complete if the participant had all the three phases of the study (i.e. non-febrile, febrile, and post-febrile phases) or completed the duration of the study. ResultsThe mean oral temperature of the participants (n=144) during the non-febrile and post-febrile phases (temperature readings=6543) were 98{degrees}F (SD, 0.61) and 98.01{degrees}F (SD, 0.60) respectively (P<0.001). The mean oral temperature during post-febrile phase was found to be 0.01{degrees}F higher than non-febrile phase. With the diurnal variability, the morning (AM), noon (AN), and afternoon (PM) mean temperatures were 97.91, 98.08, and 98.27{degrees}F (P<0.001) respectively during the non-febrile phase. Similar trends were observed in variability among men and women, and seasons. ConclusionsThe mean oral temperature is 98{degrees}F (SD, 0.61). The temperature is as low as 96.90F and as high as 99.10F. The temperature during post-febrile phase was found to be higher than the non-febrile phase temperature like PM over AN & AM, women over men, summer over other seasons in the non-febrile phase, spring over others in the post-febrile phase.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.