Development of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation test by detecting antibodies that block interaction of spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)
Richardson, C.; Gildea, S.; Harkin, S.; Gallagher, A.; Conroy, E.; McClafferty, L.; McCole, E.; Benchikh, E. O.; Reid, C. N.; Dunlop, M.; Savage, S.; Lowry, P.; Curry, J.; McConnell, R. I.; Lamont, J. V.; FitzGerald, S. P.
Show abstract
The urgent need for a rapid and reliable Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) neutralising antibody detection test compatible with routine clinical laboratory testing currently exists. This is necessary to provide accurate estimates of immunity and to monitor vaccine effectiveness. Utilising Biochip Array Technology (BAT), the Randox SARS-CoV-2 Biochip proxy virus neutralisation test (pVNT) has been developed. Immobilising SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD on the Biochip surface, innovative assay design enables direct sample addition to the Biochip well without the need for off-board sample pre-incubation step. Results are reported within 1.5 hours and testing is carried out without the prerequisite of live virus or biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory facilities. In this study, assay validation is performed using recombinant antibodies and clinical samples and an excellent correlation against conventional virus neutralisation methods is established (100% clinical specificity and 98% clinical sensitivity). Serial dilution of samples with high neutralising antibody levels demonstrate end-point sample dilutions comparable with those obtained using the SARS-CoV-2 microneutralisation test. Species independent neutralising antibody detection capacity of the SARS-CoV-2 Biochip pVNT is also demonstrated. The findings of this study exemplify the utility of the SARS-CoV-2 Biochip pVNT as a robust and reliable method for the accurate measurement of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and the availability of this test can now positively impact current testing deficiencies in this area.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance and validation of an adaptable multiplex assay for detection of serologic response to SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination 95%
- Qualification of ELISA and neutralization methodologies to measure SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity using human clinical samples 95%
- Comparative analyses of SARS-CoV-2 binding (IgG, IgM, IgA) and neutralizing antibodies from human serum samples 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Reactivity Patterns in Coronavirus Convalescent Plasma Revealed by a Coronavirus Antigen Microarray 94%
- Detection of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 by using a commercial surrogate virus neutralization ELISA: can it substitute the classical neutralization test? 94%
- A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in at-home collected finger-prick dried blood spots 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Point of Care Devices in the Laboratory and Clinical Setting 95%
- A High-throughput Microsphere-based Immunoassay of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM Testing for COVID-19 Diagnostics 94%
- A novel assessment method for COVID-19 humoral immunity duration using serial measurements in naturally infected and vaccinated subjects 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 Antibody persistence in COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors 94%
- Correlation Between SARS-COV-2 Antibody Screening By Immunoassay And Neutralizing Antibody Testing 91%
- Exponential increase in neutralizing and spike specific antibodies following vaccination of COVID-19 convalescent plasma donors 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.