Back

Open-Source Thermometer, Temperature Controller, and Light Meter for Use in Animal Facilities and During Experiments

Andreev, A.; Vasnarungruengkul, P.; Wagenaar, D. A.; Prober, D. A.

2021-05-20 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.05.18.444705 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Experiments with biological samples require precise control of environmental conditions. In our work we use zebrafish (Danio rerio) to understand the neurobiology of sleep, which requires precise control of temperature and lighting. Like many labs, lighting and temperature in the animal facility are centrally controlled in the building. During behavioral experiments and microscopy sessions, we use custom-built heating systems and perform occasional manual checks of conditions. However, without a system to precisely record conditions, gradual changes in temperature can go unnoticed for a long time, and temporary failures may be missed entirely. Here we present the design and characterization of affordable open-source tools to record temperature and light conditions during animal experiments using an Arduino microcontroller or a Raspberry Pi compact computer. The waterproof temperature sensor has high stability over 50 days of recording and is precise to 0.1{degrees}C. The Arduino device can be used through a common serial port interface for which we present code in Python and MATLAB. The Raspberry Pi version can be accessed through a web interface, for which we provide an installation guide. We use the device to record and review temperature and lighting conditions in two zebrafish animal facilities. We use our platform to add a water heating system to maintain temperature at 28{degrees}C during in vivo light-sheet imaging of larval zebrafish. We show that a change in temperature from 28{degrees}C to 32{degrees}C affects resting heart rate of the animal, highlighting the importance of maintaining and recording conditions. The protocols presented here do not require advanced engineering, fabrication, or software skills, and provide an approach to accurately record and report experimental conditions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
4
Journal of Open Source Software
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
5
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.2%
8
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
9
Gigabyte
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
10
STAR Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
11
Optics Express
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
15
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Plant Phenomics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
20
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Aging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
26
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%