Back

Rescuable effect of R-salbutamol in LPS-induced immune dysfunction of sepsis

Beng, H.; Wang, S.; Hu, J.; Liang, X.; Qin, H.; Tan, W.

2021-05-18 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2021.05.17.444573 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sepsis is a severe life-threatening condition caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. So far, there are no pharmacotherapies to stop sepsis. Salbutamol, a commonly used {beta}2-adrenoreceptor agonist, has found to be potential in regulating immune response dysfunction and exert anti-inflammatory effect. However, salbutamol exists two isomers. R-isomer exhibits the therapeutic effect and clinical benefit, while S-isomer proves to be detrimental rather than benign. So, in this study, we investigated the preventive and therapeutic effect of R-salbutamol (R-sal), S-salbutamol (S-sal) or racemic mixture in a mouse model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced sepsis. Dexamethasone (Dex) was set as comparison. The results showed that R-sal markedly improved seven-day survival rate of septic mice both administered before or after LPS. Whereas Dex showed toxic and accelerated the death of septic mice when given before LPS injection. Lung histological examination and lung function assay revealed that LPS challenge resulted in acute lung damage, including inflammatory cell infiltration, thickened alveolar septa and congestion, and decreased minute volume in septic mice. R-sal pretreatment efficiently inhibited these changes, accompanying by markedly reduced lung MPO level, serum cytokines levels and lactate release and significantly restored the lymphocytes and suppressed the percentage of monocytes. Racemic mixture exhibited diminished effects while S-sal showed enhanced cytokines release. In addition, R-sal pretreatment showed a better improvement in prognostic pulmonary function at day4 in survived mice than that of Rac-sal. Collectively, our results indicate the potential benefit of R-sal for sepsis and sepsis-induced lung injury.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.4%
2
Journal of Immunology Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
3
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.5%
5
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
British Journal of Pharmacology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Life Sciences
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
10
European Journal of Pharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
12
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
16
Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Pharmacological Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
19
Psychopharmacology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Bioscience Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Toxicological Sciences
41 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Cellular Physiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Clinical and Translational Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%