Public attitudes to COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative study
Williams, S. N.; Dienes, K. A.
Show abstract
OBJECTIVETo explore public attitudes to COVID-19 vaccines in the UK, focused on intentions and decisions around taking vaccines, views on vaccine passports, and experiences and perspectives on post-vaccination behavior. DESIGNQualitative study consisting of 6 online focus groups conducted between 15th March - 22nd April 2021. SETTINGOnline video conferencing PARTICIPANTS29 adult UK-based participants RESULTSThree main groups regarding participants decision or intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine were identified: (1) Accepters, (2) Delayers and (3) Refusers. Two reasons for vaccine delay were identified: delay due to a perceived need more information and delay until vaccine was "required" in the future. Three main facilitators (Vaccination as a social norm; Vaccination as a necessity; Trust in science) and six barriers (Preference for "natural immunity"; Concerns over possible side effects; Distrust in government; Perceived lack of information; Conspiracy theories; "Covid echo chambers") to vaccine uptake were identified. For some delayers, vaccine passports were perceived to be a reason why they would get vaccinated in the future. However, vaccine passports were controversial, and were framed in three main ways: as "a necessary evil"; as "Orwellian"; and as a "human rights problem". Participants generally felt that receiving a vaccine was not changing the extent to which people were adhering to COVID-19 measures. CONCLUSIONSOverall, positive sentiment toward vaccines was high. However, there remains a number of potential barriers which might be leading to vaccine delay in some. Vaccine delay might be a more useful and precise construct than vaccine hesitancy in explaining why some may initially ignore or be uncertain about vaccination invitations. Vaccine passports may increase or nudge uptake in some delayers but remain controversial. Earlier concerns that vaccination might reduce adherence to social distancing measures are not borne out in our data, with most people reporting ongoing adherence and caution.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccination beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours among health and social care workers in the UK: a mixed-methods study 97%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance: Correlates in a nationally representative longitudinal survey of the Australian population 95%
- Public perceptions of non-adherence to COVID-19 measures by self and others in the United Kingdom 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Social patterning and stability of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in Scotland: Will those most at risk accept a vaccine? 96%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in diverse groups in the UK - is the driver economic or cultural in student populations? 96%
- “Where the truth really lies”: Listening to voices from African American communities in the Southern States about COVID-19 vaccine information and communication 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A “step too far” or “perfect sense”? A qualitative study of British adults’ views on mandating COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine passports 98%
- The social experience of participation in a COVID-19 vaccine trial: Subjects’ motivations, others’ concerns, and insights for vaccine promotion 97%
- Localising Vaccination Services: Qualitative Insights on an Orthodox Jewish Collaboration with Public health during the UK coronavirus Vaccine Programme 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 vaccine brand hesitancy and other challenges to vaccination in the Philippines 97%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 97%
- COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and conspiracy beliefs in Togo: Findings from two cross-sectional surveys 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vaccine Confidence and Hesitancy at the start of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in the UK: An embedded mixed-methods study 97%
- COVID-19 Vaccine Perceptions And Differences By Sex, Age, And Education: Findings From A Cross-Sectional Assessment Of 1367 Community Adults In Ontario 96%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.