Back

Evaluation of the depth and width of normal fetal Sylvian fissure by trans-cerebellar section

xu, p.; zhang, d.; shi, y.; kong, f.; yao, c.; she, y.; wu, g.

2021-05-10 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2021.05.07.21256819 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveOn the basis of retrospectively analysis the trans-cerebellar section showing the Sylvian fissure of normal fetus is better than trans-thalamic section in middle and late trimester, we prospectively established the normal reference range of developmental parameters related to the Sylvian fissure of normal fetus in the trans-cerebellar section in order to provide valuable information for the diagnosis of fetal cerebral cortical dysplasia. MethodsA prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 845 normal fetuses at 21 to 32 weeks of gestation from January 2019 to September 2020. The depth and width of the Sylvian fissure was measured respectively, and regression analysis was performed according to different gestational age groups. ResultsThe depth of Sylvian fissure was positively correlated with gestational weeks, and the width of Sylvian fissure was negatively correlated with gestational weeks, with correlation coefficients 0.751 and 0.825 respectively (all P < 0.001).Taking gestational weeks as the independent variable, and the depth and width of Sylvian fissure of fetus as the dependent variables, linear regression analysis showed that there was a linear relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variables. The obtained equation was simplified to a formula: Fetal Sylvian fissure depth (mm)=7+0.6x (gestational weeks-21), Sylvian fissure width (mm)=8-0.6x (gestational weeks-21). ConclusionThe reference range of the depth and width of Sylvian fissure of normal fetus at 21 to 32 weeks of pregnancy through the trans-cerebellar section was established, which could provide valuable information for the evaluation of the normal development of the lateral fissure of fetus and the prenatal diagnosis of fetal cortical hypoplasia.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.