Safety and immunogenicity of INO-4800 DNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 clinical trial in adults at high risk of viral exposure
Mammen, M. P.; Tebas, P.; Agnes, J.; Giffear, M.; Kraynyak, K. A.; Blackwood, E.; Amante, D.; Reuschel, E. L.; Purwar, M.; Christensen-Quick, A.; Liu, N.; Andrade, V. M.; Carter, J.; Garuffi, G.; Diehl, M. C.; Sylvester, A.; Morrow, M. P.; Pezzoli, P.; Kulkarni, A. J.; Zaidi, F. I.; Frase, D.; Liaw, K.; Badie, H.; Simon, K. O.; Smith, T. R. F.; Ramos, S.; Spitz, R.; Lee, J.; Dallas, M.; Shah Brown, A.; Shea, J. E.; Kim, J. J.; Weiner, D. B.; Broderick, K. E.; Boyer, J. D.; Humeau, L. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundVaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are still urgently needed as only 5% of the global population has been vaccinated. Here we report the safety and immunogenicity of a DNA vaccine (INO-4800) targeting the full-length Spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 when given to adults at high-risk of exposure. MethodsINO-4800 was evaluated in 401 participants randomized at a 3:3:1:1 ratio to receive either INO-4800 (1 mg or 2 mg dose) or placebo (1 or 2 injections) intradermally (ID) followed by electroporation (EP) using CELLECTRA(R) 2000 at Days 0 and 28. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04642638 FindingsThe majority of adverse events (AEs) were of Grade 1 and 2 in severity and did not appear to increase in frequency with the second dose. The number of participants experiencing each of the most common AEs did not differ appreciably between the two dosing groups. The geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of binding and neutralizing antibody levels were statistically significantly greater in the 2.0 mg dose group versus the 1.0 mg dose group. The T cell immune responses measured by the ELISpot assay were also higher in the 2.0 mg dose group compared to the 1.0 mg dose group. InterpretationINO-4800 at both the 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg doses when administered in a 2-dose regimen appeared to be safe and well-tolerated in all adult ages. However, the comparative immunogenicity analysis favored selection of INO-4800 2.0 mg dose for advancement into a Phase 3 efficacy evaluation. FundingThe trial was funded by the Department of Defense Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense, (JPEO-CBRND) in coordination with the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (OASD(HA)) and the Defense Health Agency. Research in contextINO-4800 is among several vaccines being tested against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 with the goal of inducing a protective immune response. The DNA vaccine, INO-4800, administered by ID injection followed by electroporation (EP) using the CELLECTRA(R) 2000 device, induces a balanced immune response that includes engagement of both T cells and B 1-5. Added value of this studyThis is the first report of a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial of INO-4800, a DNA vaccine targeting the SARS-CoV-2 Spike antigen delivered ID followed by EP, in adults at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and Safety Following a Homologous Booster Dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 98%
- A Phase 1: Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-BBV152 97%
- Immunogenicity and safety of a third dose, and immune persistence of CoronaVac vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: interim results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of An Egg-Based Inactivated Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Interim Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1/2 Trial in Vietnam 98%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: A Randomised, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial 97%
- Immunogenicity and Safety of Booster Dose of S-268019-b or Tozinameran in Japanese Participants: An Interim Report of Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 97%
- The fourth dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine following 12 different three-dose regimens: Safety and immunogenicity to Omicron BA.4/BA.5 96%
- A First in Human Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of a G Protein Based Recombinant Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18-45 Years 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interim Analysis of a Phase I Randomized Clinical Trial on the Safety and Immunogenicity of the mRNA-1283 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity of SCB-2019, an adjuvanted, recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S-protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine in healthy 12–17 year-old adolescents 97%
- Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.