Prognostic significance of protein-coding and long non-coding RNA expression profile in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Verma, D.; Kapoor, S.; Sharma, D.; Singh, J.; Sharma, G.; Kumari, S.; Arora, M.; Bakhshi, S.; Seth, R.; Nayak, B.; Sharma, A.; Pramanik, R.; Palanichamy, J. K.; Sivasubbu, S.; Scaria, V.; Kumar, R.; Chopra, A.
Show abstract
T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is an aggressive hematological malignancy associated with poor outcome. To unravel gene-expression profile of immunophenotypic subtypes of T-ALL, we did transcriptome analysis in 35 cases. We also analyzed the prognostic relevance of 23 targets: protein-coding genes, histone modifiers and long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression profile, identified on RNA sequencing, on an independent cohort of 99 T-ALL cases. We found high expression of MEF2C to be associated with prednisolone resistance (p=0.048) and CD34 expression (p=0.012). BAALC expression was associated with expression of CD34 (p=0.032) and myeloid markers (p=0.021). XIST and KDM6a expression levels were higher in females (p=0.047 and 0.011, respectively). Post-induction minimal residual disease (MRD) positivity was associated with high lncRNA PCAT18 (p=0.04), HHEX (p=0.027) and MEF2C (p=0.007). Early thymic precursor (ETP-ALL) immunophenotype was associated with high expression of MEF2C (p=0.003), BAALC (p=0.003), LYL1 (p=0.01), LYN (p=0.01), XIST (p=0.02) and low levels of ST20 (p=0.007) and EML4 (p=0.03). On survival analysis, MEF2C high expression emerged as significant predictor of 3-year event free survival (EFS) (low 71.78{+/-}6.58% vs high 36.57{+/-}10.74%, HR 3.5, p=0.0003) and overall survival (OS) (low 94.77{+/-}2.96% vs high 78.75{+/-}8.45%, HR 4.88, p=0.016) in our patients. LncRNA MALAT1 low expression also emerged as predictor inferior OS (low 76.02{+/-}10.48 vs high 94.11{+/-}3.31, HR 0.22, p=0.027).
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- HDAC3 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia via the TYK2-STAT1-BCL2 signaling pathway 96%
- Transcriptional Regulatory Logic Orchestrating Lymphoid and Myeloid Cell Fate Decisions 91%
- The Mechanism underlying B cell Developmental Dysfunction in Kawasaki Disease Based on Single-cell Transcriptomic Sequencing 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Donor whole blood DNA methylation is not a strong predictor of acute graft versus host disease in unrelated donor allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation 93%
- Transcriptome analyses of β-thalassemia -28 (A>G) mutation using isogenic cell models generated by CRISPR/Cas9 and asymmetric single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (assODN) 92%
- Computing Skin Cutaneous Melanoma Outcome from the HLA-alleles and Clinical Characteristics 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stratified computational meta-analysis of 2213 acute myeloid leukemia patients reveals age- and sex-dependent gene expression signatures 94%
- Immune Classification of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma 92%
- Interplay of IL6 and CRIM1 on thiopurine-induced neutropenia in leukemic patients with wild-type NUDT15 and TPMT 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigation of HLA susceptibility alleles and genotypes with hematological disease among Chinese Han population 94%
- LRRC33 is a novel binding and regulating protein of TGF-β1 function in human acute myeloid leukemia cells 94%
- Prediction of myeloid malignant cells in Fanconi anemia using machine learning 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lower RNA expression of ALDH1A1 distinguishes the favorable risk group in acute myeloid leukemia 95%
- MAP Kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin are main pathways of gallbladder carcinogenesis: Results from bioinformatic analysis of Next Generation Sequencing data from a hospital-based cohort. 90%
- Tissue micro-RNAs associated with colorectal cancer prognosis: a systematic review 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.