Back

Diversity in somatic DNA repair efficiencies between commercial inbred maize lines and native Central American purple landraces

Viquez-Zamora, C.; Castro-Pacheco, S.; Vinas, M.; Bolanos-Villegas, P.

2021-04-30 plant biology
10.1101/2021.04.29.442045 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Maize is a staple food all over the world. Models for climate change suggest that, in the future, cloud formation might be reduced in the tropics increasing the exposure to Ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation, a DNA-damaging agent. UV-B (290 to 320 nm) has been shown to affect yield in maize. In this project we have determined the differences in DNA repair efficiencies between U.S. inbred lines B73 and Mo17, and Central American purple landraces from Guatemala and Costa Rica. Our results from single cell electrophoresis experiments (Comet Assay) suggest that the landrace Pujagua Santa Cruz (P1, Costa Rican) was resistant to damage caused by the radiomimetic agent zeocin (24h/100 micrograms per mL), while landrace Pujagua La Cruz (P2, Costa Rican) was able to repair DNA damage after one hour. On the other hand, line Mo17 (Missouri, USA) was unable to repair the damage, while B73 (Iowa, USA) and the landraces Jocopilas (Guatemalan), Orotina Congo (Costa Rican) and Talamanca (Costa Rican) were partially able to repair DNA damage. High Resolution Melting (HRM) curve analysis of putative homologous DNA repair gene ZeaATM1 showed that both P1 and P2 had differences in the melting temperatures for this gene compared to B73 and Mo17, while P1 showed additional differences in ZeaSOG1, ZeaRAD51 and ZeaBRCA1, suggesting that in this landrace the presence of polymorphisms may be common among key genes for this pathway. Taken together our results suggest that key adaptive differences in DNA repair efficiencies exist between inbred lines and landraces of maize and that some Central America landraces could be used as a valuable pool of alleles for plant breeding aiming to increase tolerance to radiation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
38.7%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.6%
3
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
6
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
8
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
BMC Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
17
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
18
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
23
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
26
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%