Back

Sustained SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and related hematological features in asymptomatic blood donors

Martin, M. C.; Gonzalez, M. I.; Holgado, N.; Jimenez, A.; Ortega, N.; Page, I.; Parrado, A.; Perez, M.; Blanco-Peris, L.

2021-06-04 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.04.28.21256242 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and objectivesCOVID-19 can either cause death or go unnoticed but antibodies will remain protecting us of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection for an uncertain time and to an uncertain extent. Our aim was to describe seroprevalence evolution from summer 2019 to autumn 2020 in Spain and to describe its relationship with age, blood group and haematological parameters. Materials and methodsSera and plasma from historical donation archives excluding convalescent were randomized and a total of 12,313 donations tested by a Chemiluminiscent analysis for anti SARS-CoV-2 N protein total immunoglobulins. Blood donors were 60.9% males, average age 46+/-13. Sex, age, blood group, blood cell counts and percentages and immunoglobulin concentrations were extracted from electronic recordings. ResultsA seroprevalence of 6.7% in blood donors was found by the end of the first wave. No differences by sex, age or blood group were found regarding antibodies. Leukocyte count (p=0.026), haematocrit (p<0.001) and haemoglobin (p<0.001) were lower in positive donations than in negative ones. Sex differences were present in neutrophils, leukocytes, haemoglobin and haematocrit as related to SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. ConclusionsSeroprevalence due to asymptomatic cases would resemble that of global population. Sex and age would not affect COVID-19 susceptibility but its severity. Gender differences related to COVID-19 in leukocytes, haemoglobin and haematocrit would be present in asymptomatic individuals. Further studies are needed to confirm these gender differences as they can help better understand the immune response to COVID-19, its pathogenesis and prognosis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.