Risk factors associated with severe outcomes of COVID-19: An updated rapid review to inform national guidance on vaccine prioritization in Canada
Gates, M.; Pillay, J.; Wingert, A.; Guitard, S.; Rahman, S.; Zakher, B.; Gates, A.; Hartling, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundTo inform vaccine prioritization guidance in Canada, we systematically reviewed evidence on the magnitude of association between risk factors and severe outcomes of COVID-19. The urgent nature of this review necessitated an adapted methodology, which may serve as an exemplar for reviews undertaken under strict timelines. MethodsWe updated our existing review by searching online databases and websites for cohort studies providing multivariate adjusted associations. After piloting, one author screened studies and extracted data. Two authors estimated the magnitude of association between exposures and outcomes as little-to-no (odds, risk, or hazard ratio <2.0, or >0.50 for reduction), large (2.0-3.9, or 0.50-0.26 for reduction), or very large ([≥]4.0, or [≤]0.25 for reduction), and rated the evidence certainty using GRADE. ResultsOf 11,734 unique records we included 134 reports. There is probably (moderate certainty) at least a large increase in mortality from COVID-19 among people aged 60-69 vs. <60 years (11 studies, n=517,217), with [≥]2 vs. no comorbidities (4 studies, n=189,608), and for people with (vs. without): Down syndrome (1 study, n>8 million), type 1 and 2 diabetes (1 study, n>8 million), end-stage kidney disease (1 study, n>8 million), motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, or Huntingtons disease (as a grouping; 1 study, n>8 million). The magnitude of association with mortality is probably very large for Down syndrome and may (low certainty) be very large for age 60-69 years, and diabetes. There is probably little-to-no increase in severe outcomes with several cardiovascular and respiratory conditions, and for adult males vs. females. ConclusionThere is strong evidence to support at least a large increase in mortality from COVID-19 among older adults aged 60 to 69 years versus <60 years; people having two or more versus no comorbidities; and for people affected by several pre-existing conditions. The methodology employed in this review may provide an important exemplar for future syntheses undertaken under urgent timelines. Systematic review registrationPROSPERO #CRD42021230185.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- COVID-19 and pregnancy: An umbrella review of clinical presentation, vertical transmission, and maternal and perinatal outcomes 94%
- Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Myocarditis and Pericarditis following COVID-19 Vaccination: Rapid Systematic Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Course 94%
- Clinical Severity and mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness for Omicron, Delta, and Alpha SARS-CoV-2 Variants in the United States: A Prospective Observational Study 93%
- Characterizing the incidence of adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 vaccines across eight countries: a multinational network cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 93%
- The Physical Health Trajectories of Young People with Neurodevelopmental Conditions: A Protocol for a Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies 92%
- An Analysis of Controlled Human Infection Studies Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Describing the population experiencing COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough following second vaccination in England: A cohort study from OpenSAFELY 93%
- Relation of severe COVID-19 in Scotland to transmission-related factors and risk conditions eligible for shielding support: REACT-SCOT case-control study 92%
- Ethnic differences in COVID-19 mortality in the second and third waves of the pandemic in England during the vaccine roll-out: a retrospective, population-based cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: update of a living systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- A Systematic Review of Machine Learning-based Prognostic Models for Acute Pancreatitis: Towards Improving Methods and Reporting Quality 92%
- Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.