Borf: Improved ORF prediction in de-novo assembled transcriptome annotation
Signal, B.; Kahlke, T.
Show abstract
ORF prediction in de-novo assembled transcriptomes is a critical step for RNA-Seq analysis and transcriptome annotation. However, current approaches do not appropriately account for factors such as strand-specificity and incompletely assembled transcripts. Strand-specific RNA-Seq libraries should produce assembled transcripts in the correct orientation, and therefore ORFs should only be annotated on the sense strand. Additionally, start site selection is more complex than appreciated as sequences upstream of the first start codon need to be correctly annotated as 5 UTR in completely assembled transcripts, or part of the main ORF in incomplete transcripts. Both of these factors influence the accurate annotation of ORFs and therefore the transcriptome as a whole. We generated four de-novo transcriptome assemblies of well annotated species as a gold-standard dataset to test the impact strand specificity and start site selection have on ORF prediction in real data. Our results show that prediction of ORFs on the antisense strand in data from stranded RNA libraries results in false-positive ORFs with no or very low similarity to known proteins. In addition, we found that up to 23% of assembled transcripts had no stop codon upstream and in-frame of the first start codon, instead comprising a sequence of upstream codons. We found the optimal length cutoff of these upstream sequences to accurately classify these transcripts as either complete (upstream sequence is 5 UTR) or 5 incomplete (transcript is incompletely assembled and upstream sequence is part of the ORF). Here, we present Borf, the better ORF finder, specifically designed to minimise false-positive ORF prediction in stranded RNA-Seq data and improve annotation of ORF start-site prediction accuracy. Borf is written in Python3 and freely available at https://github.com/betsig/borf.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Extensible benchmarking of methods that identify and quantify polyadenylation sites from RNA-seq data 94%
- Tailer: A Pipeline for Sequencing-Based Analysis of Non-Polyadenylated RNA 3' End Processing 94%
- Improved precision, sensitivity, and adaptability of Ordered Two-Template Relay cDNA library preparation for RNA sequencing 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.