Predicting Infection-related Consultations on Intensive Care Units - Development of a Machine Learning Prediction Model
Luz, C. F.; Soudis, D.; Renes, M. H.; Zwerwer, L. R.; Giudice, N.; Glasner, C.; Nijsten, M. W. N.; Sinha, B.
Show abstract
ObjectivesInfection-related consultations on intensive care units (ICU) build an important cornerstone in the care for critically ill patients with (suspected) infections. The positive impact of consultations on quality of care and clinical outcome has previously been demonstrated. However, timing is essential and to date consultations are typically event-triggered and reactive. Here, we investigate a proactive approach by predicting infection-related consultations using machine learning models and routine electronic health records (EHR). MethodsWe used data from a mixed ICU at a large academic tertiary care hospital including 9684 admissions. EHR data comprised demographics, laboratory results, point-of-care tests, vital signs, line placements, and prescriptions. Consultations were performed by clinical microbiologists. The predicted target outcome (occurrence of a consultation) was modelled using random forest (RF), gradient boosting machines (RF), and long short-term memory neural networks (LSTM). ResultsOverall, 7.8 % of all admission received a consultation. Time-sensitive modelling approaches and increasing numbers of patient features (parameters) performed better than static approaches in predicting infection-related consultations at the ICU. Splitting a patient admission into eight-hour intervals and using LSTM resulted in the accurate prediction of consultations up to eight hours in advance with an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.921 and an area under precision recall curve of 0.673. ConclusionWe could successfully predict of infection-related consultations on an ICU up to eight hours in advance, even without using classical triggers, such as (interim) microbiology reports. Predicting this key event can potentially streamline ICU and consultant workflows and improve care and outcome for critically ill patients with (suspected) infections.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 96%
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 96%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 96%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 95%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 96%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 94%
- ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 95%
- Limitations of estimating antibiotic resistance using German hospital consumption data - A comprehensive computational analysis 94%
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 95%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Performance of digital Early Warning Score (NEWS2) in a cardiac specialist setting: retrospective cohort study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.