Back

Understanding the Puzzle of Primary Health-care Use: Evidence from India

Sur, P. K.

2021-03-26 health economics
10.1101/2021.03.24.21254280
Show abstract

I study households primary health care usage in India, which presents a paradox. I examine why most households use fee-charging private health care services even though (1) most providers have no formal medical qualifications and (2) in markets where qualified doctors offer free care through public hospitals. I present evidence that this puzzling practice has deep historical routes. I examine Indias coercive forced sterilization policy implemented between 1976 and 1977. Utilizing the unexpected timing of the policy, multiple measures of forced sterilization, including at a granular level, and an instrumental variable approach, I document that places heavily affected by the policy have lower public health care usage today. I also show that the instrument I use is unrelated to a battery of demographic, economic, or political aspects before the forced sterilization period. Finally, I explore the mechanism and document that supply-side factors do not explain these differences. Instead, I demonstrate that places with greater exposure to forced sterilization have higher confidence in private hospitals and doctors to provide good treatment.

Matching journals

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · based on 100 published papers
#1
74× avg
2
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 25%
17.0%
3
Social Science & Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
#1
95× avg
4
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 31%
5.9%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 287 published papers
Top 10%
2.0× avg
6
Journal of Public Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 23 published papers
Top 0.5%
21× avg
7
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 12%
2.5× avg
8
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 42%
1.5%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
The Royal Society · based on 54 published papers
Top 3%
9.6× avg
10
SSM - Population Health
Elsevier BV · based on 17 published papers
Top 1%
18× avg
11
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 19%
0.9%
12
JAMA Network Open
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 125 published papers
Top 16%
0.9%
13
Public Health
Elsevier BV · based on 34 published papers
Top 7%
3.5× avg
14
Statistics in Medicine
Wiley · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.9%
15× avg
15
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Elsevier BV · based on 29 published papers
Top 3%
8.6× avg
16
Nature
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 58 published papers
Top 10%
2.4× avg
17
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) · based on 84 published papers
Top 12%
1.8× avg
18
BMC Health Services Research
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 43 published papers
Top 5%
3.7× avg
19
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Elsevier BV · based on 115 published papers
Top 18%
0.7%
20
BMJ Global Health
BMJ · based on 95 published papers
Top 12%
0.7%