Development of a Video-based Evidence Synthesis Knowledge Translation Resource: Applying a User-Centred Approach
Deliv, C.; Putnam, E.; Devane, D.; Healy, P.; Hall, A.; Rosenbaum, S.; Toomey, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundPeople of all ages and walks of life are bombarded with health claims from an array of sources. An understanding of evidence synthesis is important for people to make truly informed healthcare decisions. There is an increasing focus on the use of knowledge translation resources within healthcare; however, the development of these resources has often been poorly described or studied. ObjectivesThis study employs a user-centred approach to develop a video animation resource to explain the purpose, use and importance of evidence synthesis to the general public regarding healthcare decision-making. MethodsWe employed a user-centred approach to developing a spoken animated video that could explain evidence synthesis to a public audience, conducting several cycles of idea generation, prototyping, user-testing, analysis and refinement. Six researchers with expertise in evidence synthesis and knowledge translation resource development gave input on the key messages of the video animation and informed the first draft of the storyboard and script. Seven members of the public provided feedback on this draft through Think-aloud interviews, which we used to develop a video animation prototype. Seven additional members of the public participated in Think-aloud interviews while watching the video prototype. In addition to interviews, participants completed a questionnaire that collected data on perceived usefulness, desirability, clarity and credibility. One experienced patient and public involvement (PPI) advocate also provided feedback on the script and prototype. At the end of each feedback cycle, we assimilated all data and made necessary changes, resulting in a final, rendered version of the animation video. ResultsResearchers identified the initial key messages for the SAV as 1) the importance of evidence synthesis, 2) what an evidence synthesis is and 3) how evidence synthesis can impact healthcare decision-making. Using guidance and feedback from members of the public, we produced a three-and-a-half-minute video animation that members of the public rated 9/10 for usefulness, 8/10 for desirability, 8/10 for clarity and 9/10 for credibility. The video was uploaded on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZR0xQmZVQg) and has been viewed over 5500 times to date. ConclusionsEmploying a user-centred approach, we developed a video animation knowledge translation resource to explain evidence synthesis to the general public that was assessed as useful, desirable and clear by its intended target audience. This study describes the structured and systematic development of this knowledge translation resource and how key stakeholders and end-users informed the final output.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for the development of a tool (INSPECT-SR) to identify problematic randomised controlled trials in systematic reviews of health interventions 95%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 96%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 96%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 96%
- Following the science? Views from scientists on government advisory boards during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study in five European countries 94%
- Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Modelling Efforts For Policy Decision-Making In Lower- And Middle-Income Countries 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding Covid-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK 93%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.