Back

Decreased synthesis and variable gene transcripts of oxytocin in a domesticated avian species

Tobari, Y.; Theofanopoulou, C.; Mori, C.; Sato, Y.; Marutani, M.; Fujioka, S.; Konno, N.; Suzuki, K.; Furutani, A.; Hakataya, S.; Yao, C.-T.; Yang, E.-Y.; Tsai, C.-R.; Tang, P.-C.; Chen, C.-F.; Boeckx, C.; Jarvis, E.; Okanoya, K.

2021-03-18 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.03.17.435911 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Bengalese finch was domesticated more than 250 years ago from the wild white-rumped munia. Similar to other domesticated species, Bengalese finches show a reduced fear response and have lower corticosterone levels, compared to white-rumped munias. Bengalese finches and munias also have different song types. Since oxytocin (OT) has been found to be involved in stress coping and auditory processing, we tested whether the OT sequence and brain expression pattern and content differ in wild munias and domesticated Bengalese finches. We identified intra-strain variability in the untranslated regions of the OT sequence in Bengalese finches in comparison to the munia OT. Several of these changes fall in specific transcription factor binding sites, which show either a conserved or a relaxed evolutionary trend in the avian lineage, and in vertebrates in general. Although in situ hybridization in several hypothalamic nuclei did not reveal significant differences in the number of cells expressing OT between the two strains, real-time quantitative PCR showed significantly lower OT mRNA expression in the diencephalon of the Bengalese finches relative to munias. Our study thus points to a decreased OT synthesis in the domestic strain compared with the wild strain in birds. This is an opposite pattern from that found in some domesticated mammals, suggesting that different processes of OT function might have occurred in mammals and birds under domestication.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.