All Models Are Useful: Bayesian Ensembling for Robust High Resolution COVID-19 Forecasting
Adiga, A.; Wang, L.; Hurt, B.; Peddireddy, A. S.; Porebski, P.; Venkatramanan, S.; Lewis, B.; Marathe, M.
Show abstract
Timely, high-resolution forecasts of infectious disease incidence are useful for policy makers in deciding intervention measures and estimating healthcare resource burden. In this paper, we consider the task of forecasting COVID-19 confirmed cases at the county level for the United States. Although multiple methods have been explored for this task, their performance has varied across space and time due to noisy data and the inherent dynamic nature of the pandemic. We present a forecasting pipeline which incorporates probabilistic forecasts from multiple statistical, machine learning and mechanistic methods through a Bayesian ensembling scheme, and has been operational for nearly 6 months serving local, state and federal policymakers in the United States. While showing that the Bayesian ensemble is at least as good as the individual methods, we also show that each individual method contributes significantly for different spatial regions and time points. We compare our models performance with other similar models being integrated into CDC-initiated COVID-19 Forecast Hub, and show better performance at longer forecast horizons. Finally, we also describe how such forecasts are used to increase lead time for training mechanistic scenario projections. Our work demonstrates that such a real-time high resolution forecasting pipeline can be developed by integrating multiple methods within a performance-based ensemble to support pandemic response. ACM Reference FormatAniruddha Adiga, Lijing Wang, Benjamin Hurt, Akhil Peddireddy, Przemys-law Porebski,, Srinivasan Venkatramanan, Bryan Lewis, Madhav Marathe. 2021. All Models Are Useful: Bayesian Ensembling for Robust High Resolution COVID-19 Forecasting. In Proceedings of ACM Conference (Conference17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast and Accurate Influenza Forecasting in the United States with Inferno 97%
- An ensemble n -sub-epidemic modeling framework for short-term forecasting epidemic trajectories: Application to the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA 97%
- Improving Probabilistic Infectious Disease Forecasting Through Coherence 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Stacked ensemble method for forecasting influenza-like illness visit volumes at emergency departments 96%
- Using mobile phone data to estimate dynamic population changes and improve the understanding of a pandemic: A case study in Andorra 95%
- COVID-19: Short term prediction model using daily incidence data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A prospective real-time transfer learning approach to estimate Influenza hospitalizations with limited data 97%
- Fast and Trustworthy Nowcasting of Dengue Fever: A Case Study Using Attention-Based Probabilistic Neural Networks in Sao Paulo, Brazil 95%
- Assessing the utility of COVID-19 case reports as a leading indicator for hospitalization forecasting in the United States 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expanding optimization ensemble model methods for forecasting seasonal influenza in the U.S. 95%
- Switched forced SEIRDV compartmental models to monitor COVID-19 spread and immunization in Italy 93%
- Integrating Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks with Ordinary Differential Equations for Efficient, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learning: A Case Study in the Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.