Point-of-care ultrasonography for risk stratification of non-critical suspected COVID-19 patients on admission (POCUSCO): a prospective binational study
Morin, F.; Douillet, D.; Hamel, J. F.; Savary, D.; Aube, C.; Tazarourte, K.; Marouf, K.; Dupriez, F.; Le Conte, P.; Flament, T.; Delomas, T.; Taalba, M.; Marjanovic, N.; Couturaud, F.; Peschanski, N.; Boishardy, T.; Riou, J.; Dubee, V.; Roy, P.-M.
Show abstract
BackgroundLung point-of-care ultrasonography (L-POCUS) is highly effective in detecting pulmonary peripheral patterns and may allow early identification of patients who are likely to develop an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We hypothesized that L-POCUS performed during the initial examination would identify non-severe COVID-19 patients with a high risk of getting worse. MethodsPOCUSCO was a prospective, multicenter study. Non-critical adult patients who were admitted to the emergency department (ED) for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were included and had L-POCUS performed within 48 hours following admission. The severity of lung damage was assessed using the L-POCUS score based on 36 points for ARDS. The primary outcome was the rate of patients requiring intubation or who died within 14 days following inclusion. ResultsAmong 296 participating patients, 8 (2.7%) had primary outcome. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic of L-POCUS was 0.80 [95%CI:0.60-0.94]. The score values which achieved a sensibility > 95% in defining low-risk patients and a specificity > 95% in defining high-risk patients were <1 and [≥]16, respectively. The rate of patients with an unfavorable outcome was 0/95 (0%[95%CI:0-3.9]) for low-risk patients (score=0) versus 4/184 (2.17%[95%CI:0.8-5.5]) for intermediate-risk patients (score 1-15) and 4/17 (23.5%[95%CI:11.4-42.4]) for high-risk patients (score [≥]16). In patients with confirmed COVID-19 (n=58), the AUC of L-POCUS was 0.97 [95%CI:0.92-1.00]. ConclusionsL-POCUS allows risk-stratification of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. These results should be confirmed in a population with a higher risk of an unfavorable outcome. Trial registration numberNCT04338100
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care lung ultrasound for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis 96%
- Post-exertion oxygen saturation as a prognostic factor for adverse outcome in patients attending the emergency department with suspected COVID-19: Observational cohort study 94%
- Prognostic accuracy of emergency department triage tools for adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 96%
- Regional performance variation in external validation of four prediction models for severity of COVID-19 at hospital admission: An observational multi-centre cohort study 95%
- Admission criteria in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a physiology-based approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Point-of-care lung ultrasonography for early identification of mild COVID-19: a prospective cohort of outpatients in a Swiss screening center 96%
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 95%
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- More complaints than findings - Long-term pulmonary function in children and adolescents after COVID-19 92%
- Clinical hypoxemia score for outpatient child pneumonia care lacking pulse oximetry in Africa and South Asia 92%
- Characteristics and outcomes of cases of children and adolescents with pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome in a tertiary care center in Mexico City 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The incremental value of computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia in predicting ICU admission 95%
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 94%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.