How pain neuroscience education is performed in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a scoping review protocol
Giovinazzi, R.; Tamborrino, A.; Marelli, M.; Pellicciari, L.; Innocenti, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundPain Neuroscience Education (PNE) is an effective widely used strategy in the field of chronic pain management. The objective of this scoping review is to summarize the literature to identify how PNE is performed in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. MethodsThis scoping review will be performed in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Studies will be included if they meet the following population, concept, and context criteria: any patient with chronic musculoskeletal pain aged over 18 years old, any PNE delivery method, any context. No study design, publication type, and data restrictions will be applied. MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, Scopus, PsycInfo and PEDro databases will be searched up to March 2021. Additional records will be identified through searching in grey literature and reference lists of all relevant and included studies. Two reviewers will independently screen all title, abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. A data collection form will be developed by the research team to extract the characteristics of the studies included. A tabular and accompanying narrative summary of the information will be provided. ConclusionsThis will be the first scoping review to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic. The results will add meaningful information for future research and clinical practice. Furthermore, any knowledge gaps on the topic will be identified. The results of this research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at relevant (inter)national scientific events.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 96%
- Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping 95%
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individualised exercise in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis on the effects of exercise alone or in combination with psychological interventions on pain and disability 95%
- Management of Central Post-Stroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 94%
- Improving Power and Accuracy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Pain Treatments by Accounting for Concurrent Analgesic Use 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 95%
- The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: insights based on physiotherapists messages 94%
- Incidence of Long-term Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Related to Pain and Other Symptoms: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 95%
- Multidimensional analysis of the clinical spectrum and symptom burden of unexplained myofascial pain 91%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the low back 95%
- A Systematic review and Network Meta-analysis of pharmaceutical interventions used to manage chronic pain 94%
- Immediate effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: A factorial randomized trial 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.