Back

Integrative multi-omics approach for stratification of tumor recurrence risk groups of Hepatocellular Carcinoma patients

Kaur, H.; Raghava, G. P. S.; Lathwal, A.

2021-03-04 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.03.03.433841 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Postoperative tumor recurrence is one of the major concerns associated with the poor prognosis of HCC patients. There is yet to elucidate a standard surveillance system for HCC recurrence risk owing to complexity of this malignancy. Generation of multi-omics data from patients facilitate the identification of robust signatures for various diseases. Thus, the current study is an attempt to develop the prognostic models employing multi-omics data to significantly (p-value <0.05) stratify the recurrence high-risk (median Recurrence Free Survival time (RFS) =<12 months) and low-risk groups (median RFS >12 months). First, we identified key 90RNA, 50miRNA and 50 methylation features and developed prognostic models; attained reasonable performance (C-Index >0.70, HR >2.5), on training and validation datasets. Subsequently, we developed a prognostic (PI) model by integrating the four multi-omics features (SUZ12, hsa-mir-3936, cg18465072, and cg22852503), that are biologically inter-linked with each other. This model achieved reasonable performance on training and validation dataset, i.e. C-Index 0.72, HR of 2.37 (1.61 - 3.50), p-value of 6.72E-06, Brier score 0.19 on training dataset, and C-Index 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63 - 0.80), HR of 2.37 (95% CI: 1.61 - 3.50), p-value of 0.015, Brier score 0.19 on validation dataset. Eventually, Drugbank data was investigated to elucidate therapeutic potential of these signatures. We have identified nine potential drugs against three genes (CA9, IL1A, KCNJ15) that are positively correlated with the tumor recurrence. We anticipate these results from our study will help researchers and clinicians to improve the HCC recurrence surveillance, eventually outcome of patients.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.