A rapid review of equity considerations in large-scale testing campaigns during infectious disease epidemics
Ost, K.; Duquesne, L.; Duguay, C.; Traverson, L.; Mathevet, I.; Ridde, V.; Zinszer, K.
Show abstract
ContextLarge-scale testing is an intervention that is instrumental for infectious disease control and a central tool for the COVID-19 pandemic. Our rapid review aimed to identify if and how equity has been considered in large-scale testing initiatives. MethodsWe searched Web of Science and PubMed in November 2020 and followed PRISMA recommendations for scoping reviews. Articles were analyzed using descriptive and thematic analysis. ResultsOur search resulted in 291 studies of which 41 were included for data extraction after full article screening. Most of the included articles (83%) reported on HIV-related screening programs, while the remaining programs focused on other sexually transmitted infections (n=3) or COVID-19 (n=4). None of the studies presented a formal definition of (in)equity in testing, however, 23 articles did indirectly include elements of equity in the program or intervention design, largely through the justification of their target population. ConclusionThe studies included in our rapid review did not explicitly consider equity in their design or evaluation. It is imperative that equity is incorporated into the design of infectious disease testing programs and serves as an important reminder of how equity considerations are needed for SARS-CoV-2 testing and vaccination programs.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term health system responses to epidemics across hard-to-reach areas in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 93%
- A randomized stepped wedge trial of an intensive combination approach to roll back the HIV epidemic in Nigerian Adolescents: iCARE Nigeria treatment support protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mentorship in Health Research Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Benefits, Successes, Gaps and Challenges 95%
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: a scoping review 94%
- Gaps and Opportunities for Data Systems and Economics to Support Priority Setting for Climate-Sensitive Infectious Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Rapid Scoping Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A decade of Acceptability Research with Adolescents in Africa: Systematic review and evidence map 96%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 94%
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of the Kunonga Framework for Extending Approaches in Health Inequality and Inequity Evidence Syntheses 92%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Community Perceptions of Vaccination Among Influential Stakeholders: Qualitative Research in Rural India 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Development and Implementation of a Preconception Counseling Program for Black Women and Men in the Southeastern United States: A Pilot Protocol 93%
- Impact of the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic on coverage of RMNH interventions in Ethiopia 92%
- Understanding care-seeking of pregnant women from underserved groups: A systematic review and meta-ethnography 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.