Evolutionary trajectories and transmission dynamics of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Tibet, China
Jiang, Q.; Liu, H.-C.; Liu, Q.-Y.; Phelan, J. E.; Shi, L.; Gao, M.; Zhao, X.-Q.; Wang, J.; Glynn, J. R.; Yang, C.-G.; Takiff, H. E.; Wan, K.-L.; Clark, T. G.; Gao, Q.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTibet has the highest prevalence of both tuberculosis disease and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in China. The circulated Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from Tibet were sequenced to investigate the underlying drivers for the high burden of MDR-TB. MethodsUsing whole-genome sequencing data of 576 M. tuberculosis strains isolated from consecutive patients in Tibet, we mapped resistance-conferring mutations onto phylogenetic trees to determine their evolution and spread. The impact of drug resistance on bacterial population growth was assessed with a Bayesian (Skyline Plot) analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the development of rifampicin resistance. ResultsOf the 576 isolates, 284 (49.3%), 280 (48.6%), and 236 (41.0%) were, respectively, genetically resistant to isoniazid, rifampicin, or both (MDR-TB). Among the isoniazid- and rifampicin-resistant strains, the proportions in phylogenetically-inferred clusters were 77.8% (221/284) and 62.1% (174/280), respectively. Nearly half (47.2%, 134/284) of the isoniazid-resistant strains were in six major clades, which contained between 8 and 58 strains with katG S315T, katG S315N, or fabG1 promoter -15 C>T resistance mutations. These major clades exponentially expanded after emerging with isoniazid resistance and stabilized before evolving into MDR-TB twenty years later. Isoniazid-resistant isolates showed an increased risk of accumulating rifampicin resistance compared to isoniazid-susceptible strains, with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.81 (95% confidence interval 2.47-5.95). ConclusionHistorical expansion of isoniazid-resistant strains and their increased likelihood of acquiring rifampicin resistance both contributed to the high burden of MDR-TB in Tibet, highlighting the need to detect INH-resistant strains promptly and to control their transmission.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deciphering the tangible spatio-temporal spread of a 25 years tuberculosis outbreak boosted by social determinants 94%
- Mutations in the ubiA gene are the major mechanism of ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium avium 93%
- Development of a multiplex real-time PCR assay for BCG and validation in a clinical laboratory 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality of Drug-resistant Tuberculosis in High-burden Countries: Comparison of Routine Drug Susceptibility Testing with Whole-genome Sequencing 95%
- Deciphering Bedaquiline and Clofazimine Resistance in Tuberculosis: An Evolutionary Medicine Approach 94%
- Selection of artemisinin partial resistance Kelch13 mutations in Uganda in 2016-22 was at a rate comparable to that seen previously in South-East Asia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exhaled Mycobacterium tuberculosis predicts incident infection in household contacts 94%
- Spontaneous emergence of azithromycin resistance in independent lineages of Salmonella Typhi in Northern India 94%
- Revisiting the Natural History of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: a Bayesian Estimation of Natural Recovery and Mortality rates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Programmatic diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of Xpert MTB/XDR in patients with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Georgia 94%
- Potential Utility of C-reactive Protein for Tuberculosis Risk Stratification among Patients with Non-Meningitic Symptoms at HIV Diagnosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 92%
- Changes in the prevalence of antimalarial partner drug resistance markers and policy in six sub-Saharan African countries from 2000 to 2021: A systematic review 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.