Back

Effects of early geometric confinement on the transcriptomic profile of human cerebral organoids

Sen, D.; Voulgaropoulos, A.; Keung, A. J.

2021-02-19 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.02.18.431674 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBiophysical factors such as shape and mechanical forces are known to play crucial roles in stem cell differentiation, embryogenesis and neurodevelopment. However, the complexity and experimental challenges capturing such early stages of development, and ethical concerns associated with human embryo and fetal research, limit our understanding of how these factors affect human brain organogenesis. Human cerebral organoids (hCO) are attractive models due to their ability to model important brain regions and transcriptomics of early in vivo brain development. Furthermore, they provide three-dimensional environments that better mimic the in vivo environment. To date, they have been used to understand the effects of genetics and soluble factors on neurodevelopment. Establishing links between spatial factors and hCO development will require the development of new approaches. ResultsHere, we investigated the effects of early geometric confinements on transcriptomic changes during hCO differentiation. Using a custom and tunable agarose microwell platform we generated embryoid bodies (EB) of diverse shapes and then further differentiated those EBs to whole brain hCOs. Our results showed that the microwells did not have negative gross impacts on the ability of the hCOs to differentiate generally towards neural fates, and there were clear shape dependent effects on neural lineage specification. In particular, we observed that non-spherical shapes showed signs of altered neurodevelopmental kinetics and favored the development of medial ganglionic eminence-associated brain regions and cell types over cortical regions. ConclusionsThe findings presented here suggest a role for spatial factors in brain region specification during hCO development. Understanding these spatial patterning factors will not only improve understanding of in vivo development and differentiation, but also provide important handles with which to advance and improve control over human model systems for in vitro applications.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
2
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.1%
4
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
7
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
11
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
21
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
28
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%