Are fast test results preferable to high test sensitivity in contact-tracing strategies?
Juul, J. L.; Graesboell, K.
Show abstract
Across the world, countries are fighting to reduce the spread of COVID-19. The backbone of the response is a test-trace-isolate strategy, where suspected infected get tested and isolated and possible secondary cases get traced, tested and isolated. Because more accurate tests often take longer to analyze, and the benefits of contact tracing are strengthened by rapid diagnosis, there exists a trade-off in test sensitivity and test waiting time in test-trace-isolate strategies. Here we ask: How many false negatives can be tolerated in a rapid test so that it reduces transmission better than a slower, more accurate test? How does this change with contact tracing efficiency and test waiting time? We find that a rapid, less sensitive test performs best for many test-parameter choices and that this is true even for modest contact tracing efficiency. For COVID-19-like viral parameters, a test with 40% false negatives and immediate result might reduce transmission as well as a test with no false negatives and a 3-day waiting time. Our analysis suggests employing rapid tests to reduce test waiting times as a viable strategy to reduce transmission when testing infrastructure is under stress.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive vaccination may be needed to eliminate COVID-19: Results from a runtime-alterable strain-drift and waning-immunity model 97%
- A stochastic epidemiological model to estimate the size of an outbreak at the first case identification 96%
- Model-informed optimal allocation of limited resources to mitigate infectious disease outbreaks in societies at war 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of COVID-19 variant importation – How useful are travel control measures? 96%
- Stochastic simulation of successive waves of COVID-19 in the province of Barcelona 96%
- The relationship between controllability, optimal testing resource allocation, and incubation-latent period mismatch as revealed by COVID-19 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.