Back

Generalizing about GC (hypoxia): Dys- & Dat-InformaticaComment on Germinal center B cells selectively oxidize fatty acids for energy while conducting minimal glycolysis

Boothby, M. R.; Raybuck, A.; Cho, S. H.; Stengel, K.; Hiebert, S. W.; Li, J.

2021-01-30 immunology
10.1101/2021.01.28.428711 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Steadily accumulating evidence supports the concept that the outputs of immune responses are influenced by local nutrient and metabolite conditions or concentrations, as well as by the molecular programming of intermediary metabolism within immune cells. Humoral immunity and germinal center reactions are one setting in which these factors are under active investigation. Hypoxia has been highlighted as one example of how a particular nutrient is distributed in primary and secondary follicles during an antibody response, and how its sensors could impact the qualities of antibody output after immunization. Based on a bio-informatic analysis of mRNA levels in germinal center and other B cells, recently published work challenges the concept that there is any hypoxia or that it has any influence. In this perspective, we perform new analyses of published genomics data to explore potential sources of disparity and elucidate aspects of what on the surface might seem to be conflicting conclusions. In particular, the replicability and variance among data sets derived from different naive as well as germinal center B cells are considered. The results of the investigation highlight several broader issues that merit consideration, especially at a time of heightened focus on scientific reports in the realm of immunity and antibody responses. From one finding of this re-analysis, it is proposed that a standard should be expected in which the relationship of new data sets compared to prior "fingerprints" of cell types should be reported transparently to referees and readers. In light of the strong evidence for diversity in the constituencies within germinal centers elicited by protein immunization, it also is proposed that a core practice should be to avoid overly broad conclusions about germinal centers in general when experimental systems are subject to substantial constraints imposed by technical features.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.0%
2
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
3
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
6
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
11
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
17
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
19
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
23
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Immunology & Cell Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
26
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
27
ImmunoInformatics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%