The therapeutic effect of intra-articular facet joint injection with normal saline as a comparator for chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nopsopon, T.; Pongpirul, K.; Rittiphairoj, T.; Lertparinyaphorn, I.; Suputtitada, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundIntra-articular facet joint injection (FJI) has been increasingly used as a treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP). Choice of the substance has been based on clinical experience with unclear evidence on marginal effectiveness of active substance over normal saline as a placebo control. This systematic review investigates the comparative effectiveness between normal saline and active substances on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). MethodsSystematic search was conducted in five databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials and observational studies of evaluating the PROs of FJI comparing active injected substances with normal saline as placebo in chronic LBP patients in the English language without publication date restriction. Quality assessment was performed using ROB2 and ROBINS-I. The meta-analysis was done using a random-effects model. Mean difference with 95% CIs of efficacy outcomes including pain, numbness, disability, quality of life were measured. ResultsOf 2,467 potential studies, three were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis (247 patients). Compared to other active substances, normal saline provided similar therapeutic effects on pain outcome within one hour (MD 2.43, 95% CI -11.61 to 16.50), at 1-1.5 months follow up (MD -0.63, 95% CI -7.97 to 6.72), and at 3 to 6 months (MD 1.90, 95% CI -16.03 to 19.83) as well as the quality of life at one and six months follow-up. ConclusionsThe short-term and long-term clinical improvements of intra-articular FJI using normal saline are comparable to the other active substances in LBP patients. PROSPEROregistration number CRD42020216426
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness and clinical relevance of kinesio taping in musculoskeletal disorders: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and evidence mapping 95%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 95%
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 95%
- Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analyses 95%
- Incidence of Long-term Post-acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Related to Pain and Other Symptoms: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individualised exercise in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis on the effects of exercise alone or in combination with psychological interventions on pain and disability 96%
- Management of Central Post-Stroke Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 95%
- Improving Power and Accuracy in Randomized Controlled Trials of Pain Treatments by Accounting for Concurrent Analgesic Use 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 95%
- Multidimensional analysis of the clinical spectrum and symptom burden of unexplained myofascial pain 90%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Delphi Study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.