Back

In-silico Structural and Molecular Docking-Based Drug Discovery Against Viral Protein (VP40) of Marburg Virus: A Causative Agent of MAVD

Quazi, S.; Golani, T.; Akhtar, N.; Thomas, C. E.; Haider, Z.

2021-01-27 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.01.26.427942 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Marburg virus (MARV) is reported to induce extreme hemorrhagic fever (MHF) with a high degree of infectivity and lethality in both human and non-human primates. An appropriate vaccination for this viruss treatment is not yet usable, and thus needs intensive attempts on multiple scales. In this study, we employed the Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD) based approach to identify the drug-like compounds inhibiting the replication of the Viral protein (VP40) of MARV. Our database search using an online database "PubChem" retrieved [~]3000 compounds structure-based similarity. Lipinskis rule was applied to evaluate further the drug-like compounds, followed by molecular docking-based screening, and the selection of screening ligand complex with VP40 based on S-score (lower than reference Favipiravir inhibitor) and root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD) value (probably less than 2) using AutoDock 4.2. Resultantly, [~]100 compounds were identified having strong interaction with VP40 of MARV. After evaluating their binding energy using the AutoDock 4.2 software, four compounds (CID-67534452, CID-72201087, CID-123273976, CID-153708661) were identified that showed strongest binding energy with VP40 of MARV and strong inhibition effect than the Favipiravir. Robust binding energy, useful ADMET parameters and drug-likeness suggest that these candidates "CID-67534452, CID-72201087, CID-123273976, CID-153708661" have tremendous potential to stop the replication of MARV, hence might lead to the cure of MAVD.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.