Back

Whole-Cell Dissociated Suspension Analysis in Human Brain Neurodegenerative Disease: A Pilot Study

Serrano, G.; Walker, J. E.; Intorcia, A. J.; Glass, M. J.; Arce, R. A.; Piras, I. S.; Talboom, J. S.; Nelson, C. M.; Cutler, B. D.; Sue, L. I.; Lue, L.-F.; Huentelman, M.; Beach, T. G.

2021-01-09 pathology
10.1101/2021.01.08.21249455
Show abstract

Biochemical analysis of human brain tissue is typically done by homogenizing whole pieces of brain and separately characterizing the proteins, RNA, DNA, and other macromolecules within. While this has been sufficient to identify substantial changes, there is little ability to identify small changes or alterations that may occur in subsets of cells. To effectively investigate the biochemistry of disease in the brain, with its different cell types, we must first separate the cells and study them as phenotypically defined populations or even as individuals. In this project, we developed a new method for the generation of whole-cell-dissociated-suspensions (WCDS) in fresh human brain tissue that could be shared as a resource with scientists to study single human cells or populations. Characterization of WCDS was done in paraffin-embedded sections stained with H&E, and by phenotyping with antibodies using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Additionally, we compared extracted RNA from WCDS with RNA from adjacent intact cortical tissue, using RT-qPCR for cell-type-specific RNA for the same markers as well as whole transcriptome sequencing. More than 11,626 gene transcripts were successfully sequenced and classified using an external database either as being mainly expressed in neurons, astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, endothelial cells, or mixed (in two or more cell types). This demonstrates that we are currently capable of producing WCDS with a full representation of different brain cell types combined with RNA quality suitable for use in biochemical analysis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Neuropathologica
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
12.2%
2
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 1%
9.9%
3
The American Journal of Pathology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
7.4%
4
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 11%
7.4%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 59%
7.4%
6
Modern Pathology
based on 10 papers
Top 0.4%
5.7%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia
based on 84 papers
Top 3%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 54%
2.9%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 0.6%
2.7%
10
Cell Reports
based on 25 papers
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Biomedicines
based on 21 papers
Top 0.8%
2.4%
12
Human Brain Mapping
based on 53 papers
Top 4%
2.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Pathology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
2.3%
14
Neurobiology of Disease
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
2.2%
15
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
based on 31 papers
Top 3%
2.2%
16
Cells
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Translational Psychiatry
based on 94 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
based on 10 papers
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
Analytical Chemistry
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
22
JCI Insight
based on 63 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Brain Communications
based on 79 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 15%
0.7%
25
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
26
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
27
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
28
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
based on 28 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 13%
0.7%