Generalized Prediction of Shock in Intensive Care Units using Deep Learning
Nagori, A.; Kalia, A.; Sharma, A.; Singh, P.; Bandhey, H.; Ailavadi, P.; Awasthi, R.; Bhadra, W.; Kaul, A.; Lodha, R.; Sethi, T.
Show abstract
Early prediction of hemodynamic shock in the ICU can save lives. Several studies have leveraged a combination of vitals, lab investigations, and clinical data to construct early warning systems for shock. However, these have a limited potential of generalization to diverse settings due to reliance on non-real-time data. Monitoring data from vitals can provide an early real-time prediction of Hemodynamic shock which can precede the clinical diagnosis to guide early therapy decisions. Generalization across age and geographical context is an unaddressed challenge. In this retrospective observational study, we built real-time shock prediction models generalized across age groups (adult and pediatric), ICU-types, and geographies. We trained, validated, and tested a shock prediction model on the publicly available eICU dataset on 208 ICUs across the United States. Data from 156 hospitals passed the eligibility criteria for cohort building. These were split hospital-wise in a five-fold training-validation-test set. External validation of the model was done on a pediatric ICU in New Delhi and MIMIC-III database with more than 0.23 million and one million patient-hours vitals data, respectively. Our models identified 92% of all the shock events more than 8 hours in advance with AUROC of 86 %(SD= 1.4) and AUPRC of 93% (SD =1.2) on the eICU testing set. An AUROC of 87 % (SD =1.8), AUPRC 92 % (SD=1.6) were obtained in external validation on the MIMIC-III cohort. The New Delhi Pediatric SafeICU data achieved an AUROC of 87 % (SD =4) AUPRC 91% (SD=3), despite being completely different geography and age group. In this first, we demonstrate a generalizable model for predicting shock, and algorithms are publicly available as a pre-configured Docker environment at https://github.com/tavlab-iiitd/ShoQPred.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 95%
- Explaining Deep Neural Networks for Knowledge Discovery in Electrocardiogram Analysis 94%
- Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Intensive Care Unit Resource Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age Prediction From 12-lead Electrocardiograms Using Deep Learning: A Comparison of Four Models on a Contemporary, Freely Available Dataset 93%
- Highly comparative time series analysis of oxygen saturation and heart rate to predict respiratory outcomes in extremely preterm infants 92%
- Prospective validation of clinical deterioration predictive models prior to intensive care unit transfer among patients admitted to acute care cardiology wards 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction 94%
- Image and structured data analysis for prognostication of health outcomes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Predicting mortality in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients in the inpatient setting using a Novel Deep Neural Network 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of atrial fibrillation and stroke using machine learning models in UK Biobank 91%
- ChatGPT achieves comparable accuracy to specialist physicians in predicting the efficacy of high-flow oxygen therapy 90%
- Quantitative chest CT combined with plasma cytokines predict outcomes in COVID-19 patients 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.