Back

Post operative acute kidney injury in abdominal Surgeries. A retrospective analysis of single center in western India.

VASAVADA, B.; Patel, H.

2021-01-06 surgery
10.1101/2021.01.05.21249252 medRxiv
Show abstract

AIMThe aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence and causative factors for acute kidney injury in abdominal surgeries. Material and MethodsAll the abdominal surgeries performed between April 2018 to December 2020, in our institution have been analyzed for acute kidney injury. Acute kidney injury defined according to acute kidney injury network classification. Categorical variables were evaluated by chi-square t-test or fishers t-test wherever appropriate and continuous variables by Mann Whitney U test for nonparametric data and student t-test for parametric test after skewness and kurtosis analysis. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 23. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsWe performed 402 gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary surgery from April 2018 to December 2020. After exclusion 372 patients were included in the study population. 20 patients (5.37%) were defined as having acute kidney injury according to acute kidney injury network classifications. On univariate analysis acute kidney injury was associated with open surgery (p= 0.003), Intraoperative hypotension (p<0.001), Colorectal surgeries (p<0.0001), Emergency surgery (p=0.028), CDC grade of surgery (p<0.001), increased used to blood products (p=0.001), higher ASA grade (p<0.0001), increased operative time(p<0.0001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis higher ASA grade (p<0.0001) and increased operative time (0.049) independently predicted acute kidney injury. Acute kidney injury was also significantly associated with 90 days mortality. (p= <0.0001). ConclusionPost-operative acute kidney injury was associated with significant mortality in abdominal surgery. Higher ASA grades and increased operative time predicted acute kidney injury.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.