Back

Vaccination and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions: when can the UK relax about COVID-19?

Moore, S.; Hill, E. M.; Tildesley, M.; Dyson, L. M.; Keeling, M. J.

2021-01-02 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.12.27.20248896 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe announcement of efficacious vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2 has been met with worldwide acclaim and relief. Many countries already have detailed plans for vaccine targeting based on minimising severe illness, death and healthcare burdens. Normally, relatively simple relationships between epidemiological parameters, vaccine efficacy and vaccine uptake predict the success of any immunisation programme. However, the dynamics of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is made more complex by age-dependent factors, changing levels of infection and the potential relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) as the perceived risk declines. MethodsIn this study we use an age-structured mathematical model, matched to a range of epidemiological data in the UK, that also captures the roll-out of a two-dose vaccination programme targeted at specific age groups. FindingsWe consider the interaction between the UK vaccination programme and future relaxation (or removal) of NPIs. Our predictions highlight the population-level risks of early relaxation leading to a pronounced wave of infection, hospital admissions and deaths. Only vaccines that offer high infection-blocking efficacy with high uptake in the general population allow relaxation of NPIs without a huge surge in deaths. InterpretationWhile the novel vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 offer a potential exit strategy for this outbreak, this is highly contingent on the infection-blocking (or transmission-blocking) action of the vaccine and the population uptake, both of which need to be carefully monitored as vaccine programmes are rolled out in the UK and other countries. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSVaccination has been seen as a key tool in the fight against SARS-CoV-2. The vaccines already developed represent a major technological achievement and have been shown to generate significant immune responses, as well as offering considerable protection against disease. However, to date there is limited information on the degree of infection-blocking these vaccines are likely to induce. Mathematical models have already successfully been used to consider age- and risk-structured targeting of vaccination, highlighting the importance of prioritising older and high-risk individuals. Added value of this studyTranslating current knowledge and uncertainty of vaccine behaviour into meaningful public health messages requires models that fully capture the within-country epidemiology as well as the complex roll-out of a two-dose vaccination programme. We show that under reasonable assumptions for vaccine efficacy and uptake the UK is unlikely to reach herd immunity, which means that non-pharmaceutical interventions cannot be released without generating substantial waves of infection. Implications of all the available evidenceVaccination is likely to provide substantial individual protection to those receiving two doses, but the degree of protection to the wider population is still uncertain. While substantial immunisation of the most vulnerable groups will allow for some relaxation of controls, this must be done gradually to prevent large scale public health consequences.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.1%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
6
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
7
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
8
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
10
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
14
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
16
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
27
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%