Quantitative plasma proteomics of survivor and non-survivor COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital unravels potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets
di Flora, D. C.; Valle, A. D.; Pereira, H. A. B. d. S.; Garbieri, T. F.; Buzalaf, N. R.; Reis, F. N.; Grizzo, L. T.; Dionisio, T. J.; Leite, A. d. L.; Pereira, V. B. R.; Rosa, D. M. C.; dos Santos, C. F.; Buzalaf, M. A. R.
Show abstract
The development of new approaches that allow early assessment of which cases of COVID-19 will likely become critical and the discovery of new therapeutic targets are urgent demands. In this cohort study, we performed proteomic and laboratorial profiling of plasma from 163 patients admitted to Bauru State Hospital (Bauru, SP, Brazil) between May 4th and July 4th, 2020, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 by RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab samples. Plasma samples were collected upon admission for routine laboratory analyses and shotgun quantitative label-free proteomics. Based on the course of the disease, the patients were further divided into 3 groups: a) mild symptoms, discharged without admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) (n=76); b) severe symptoms, discharged after admission to an ICU (n=56); c) critical, died after admission to an ICU (n=31). White cells and neutrophils were significantly higher in severe and critical patients compared to mild ones. Lymphocytes were significantly lower in critical patients compared to mild ones and platelets were significantly lower in critical patients compared to mild and severe ones. Ferritin, TGO, urea and creatinine were significantly higher in critical patients compared to mild and severe ones. Albumin, CPK, LDH and D-dimer were significantly higher in severe and critical patients compared to mild ones. PCR was significantly higher in severe patients compared to mild ones. Proteomic analysis revealed marked changes between the groups in plasma proteins related to complement activation, blood coagulation, antimicrobial humoral response, acute inflammatory response, and endopeptidase inhibitor activity. Higher levels of IREB2, GELS, POLR3D, PON1 and ULBP6 upon admission to hospital were found in patients with mild symptoms, while higher levels of Gal-10 were found in critical and severe patients. This needs to be validated in further studies. If confirmed, pathways involving these proteins might be potential new therapeutic targets for COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of ABO blood group with COVID-19 severity, acute phase reactants and mortality 96%
- A proteomic perspective and involvement of cytokines in SARS-CoV-2 infection 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection induces mixed M1/M2 phenotype in circulating monocytes and alterations in both dendritic cell and monocyte subsets 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune-Based Prediction of COVID-19 Severity and Chronicity Decoded Using Machine Learning 94%
- Circulatory Cytokines and Chemokines Profile in Human Coronaviruses: A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Machine Learning Identifies Complicated Sepsis Trajectory and Subsequent Mortality Based on 20 Genes in Peripheral Blood Immune Cells at 24 Hours post ICU admission 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 95%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 94%
- IFNL4 genetic variant can predispose to COVID-19 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative systems biology approach identified crucial genes and transcription factors associated with gallbladder cancer pathogenesis 93%
- Early Outpatient Treatment Of COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis Of 392 Cases In Italy 92%
- Administration of tocilizumab to patients with high concentrations of IL-6 in the course of COVID-19 is associated with a better prognosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.